Separating Geodesic Structure and Product Structure
摘要
The geodesic treewidth of a graph is the smallest for which there is a partition into geodesics such that has treewidth , where is obtained from by contracting each part of . Based on this notion, row treewidth was developed and is defined for a graph as the smallest such that for some graph of treewidth and a path . Equivalently, the row treewidth of a graph is the smallest for which there is a partition into disjoint unions of geodesics that are aligned with respect to some layering such that has treewidth . We separate the two notions by showing that bounded row treewidth does not imply bounded geodesic treewidth and by presenting a polynomial-time algorithm to decide whether a graph of treewidth 2 has geodesic treewidth 1, which is known to be NP-hard for row treewidth [Biedl, Eppstein, Ueckerdt, 2025]. More generally, we provide an algorithm to decide whether a given graph has geodesic treewidth at most that is XP in the treewidth, whereas there is no such algorithm for row treewidth, unless P = NP [Biedl, Eppstein, Ueckerdt, 2025]. On the other hand, we show that computing the geodesic treewidth is NP-hard and that every graph with geodesic treewidth 1 has bounded row treewidth. Moreover, we improve the best known lower bound on the geodesic treewidth of planar graphs to 5.
引用
@article{arxiv.2607.02098,
title = {Separating Geodesic Structure and Product Structure},
author = {Laura Merker and Lena Scherzer and Samuel Schneider},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.02098},
year = {2026}
}
备注
An extended abstract of this paper appears in the proceedings of the 34th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2026)