中文

Separating Geodesic Structure and Product Structure

组合数学 2026-07-02 v1 离散数学 数据结构与算法

摘要

The geodesic treewidth of a graph G G is the smallest kk for which there is a partition P\mathcal{P} into geodesics such that G/PG/\mathcal{P} has treewidth kk, where G/PG/\mathcal{P} is obtained from G G by contracting each part of P \mathcal{P} . Based on this notion, row treewidth was developed and is defined for a graph G G as the smallest k k such that GHP G \subseteq H \boxtimes P for some graph H H of treewidth k k and a path P P . Equivalently, the row treewidth of a graph G G is the smallest k k for which there is a partition P \mathcal{P} into disjoint unions of geodesics that are aligned with respect to some layering such that G/P G/\mathcal{P} has treewidth k k . We separate the two notions by showing that bounded row treewidth does not imply bounded geodesic treewidth and by presenting a polynomial-time algorithm to decide whether a graph of treewidth 2 has geodesic treewidth 1, which is known to be NP-hard for row treewidth [Biedl, Eppstein, Ueckerdt, 2025]. More generally, we provide an algorithm to decide whether a given graph has geodesic treewidth at most d d that is XP in the treewidth, whereas there is no such algorithm for row treewidth, unless P = NP [Biedl, Eppstein, Ueckerdt, 2025]. On the other hand, we show that computing the geodesic treewidth is NP-hard and that every graph with geodesic treewidth 1 has bounded row treewidth. Moreover, we improve the best known lower bound on the geodesic treewidth of planar graphs to 5.

引用

@article{arxiv.2607.02098,
  title  = {Separating Geodesic Structure and Product Structure},
  author = {Laura Merker and Lena Scherzer and Samuel Schneider},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.02098},
  year   = {2026}
}

备注

An extended abstract of this paper appears in the proceedings of the 34th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2026)