Reply to: 'Reply to: "Comment on: `How much security does Y-00 protocol provide us?` " '
量子物理
2007-05-23 v1
摘要
Nishioka et al claim in [1], elaborating on their earlier paper [2], that the direct encryption scheme called Y-00 [3,4] is equivalent to a classical non-random additive stream cipher, and thus offers no more security than the latter. In this paper, we show that this claim is false and that Y-00 may be considered equivalent to a \emph{random} cipher. We explain why a random cipher provides additional security compared to its nonrandom counterpart. Some criticisms in [1] on the use of Y-00 for key generation are also briefly responded to.
引用
@article{arxiv.quant-ph/0509092,
title = {Reply to: 'Reply to: "Comment on: `How much security does Y-00 protocol provide us?` " '},
author = {Ranjith Nair and Horace P. Yuen and Eric Corndorf and Prem Kumar},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:quant-ph/0509092},
year = {2007}
}
备注
Submitted to Phys. Lett. A