English

Online Hitting of Unit Balls and Hypercubes in $\mathbb{R}^d$ using Points from $\mathbb{Z}^d$

Computational Geometry 2025-12-22 v3

Abstract

We consider the online hitting set problem for the range space Σ=(X,R)\Sigma=(\cal X,\cal R), where the point set X\cal X is known beforehand, but the set R\cal R of geometric objects is not known in advance. Here, objects from R\cal R arrive one by one. The objective of the problem is to maintain a hitting set of the minimum cardinality by taking irrevocable decisions. In this paper, we consider the problem when objects are unit balls or unit hypercubes in Rd\mathbb{R}^d, and the points from Zd\mathbb{Z}^d are used for hitting them. First, we address the case when objects are unit intervals in R\mathbb{R} and present an optimal deterministic algorithm with a competitive ratio of~22. Then, we consider the case when objects are unit balls. For hitting unit balls in R2\mathbb{R}^2 and R3\mathbb{R}^3, we present 44 and 1414-competitive deterministic algorithms, respectively. On the other hand, for hitting unit balls in Rd\mathbb{R}^d, we propose an O(d4)O(d^4)-competitive deterministic algorithm, and we demonstrate that}, for d<4d<4, the competitive ratio of any deterministic algorithm is at least d+1d+1. In the end, we explore the case where objects are unit hypercubes. For hitting unit hypercubes in R2\mathbb{R}^2 and R3\mathbb{R}^3, we obtain 44 and 88-competitive deterministic algorithms, respectively. For hitting unit hypercubes in Rd\mathbb{R}^d (d3d\geq 3), we present an O(d2)O(d^2)-competitive randomized algorithm. Furthermore, we prove that the competitive ratio of any deterministic algorithm for the problem is at least d+1d+1 for any dNd\in\mathbb{N}.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2303.11779,
  title  = {Online Hitting of Unit Balls and Hypercubes in $\mathbb{R}^d$ using Points from $\mathbb{Z}^d$},
  author = {Minati De and Satyam Singh},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.11779},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

There was a typographical error in the proof of Lemma 4. This has been corrected and is highlighted in blue

R2 v1 2026-06-28T09:26:05.738Z