Agri-Query:评估跨语言技术问答中 RAG 与长上下文 LLM 的案例研究
摘要
我们提出了一个案例研究,评估拥有 128K token 上下文窗口的大型语言模型(LLM) on technical question answering(QA)任务。我们的 benchmark is built on one of agricultural machine 的 user manual,可用英文、法语和德语。它模拟了 cross-lingual information retrieval scenario,其中 questions are posed in English against all three language versions of the manual。evaluation focuses on realistic needle-in-a-haystack challenges and includes unanswerable questions to test for hallucinations。我们比较了 nine long-context LLMs using direct prompting against three Retrieval-Augmented Generation(RAG)strategies(keyword、semantic、hybrid),with an LLM-as-a-judge for evaluation。Our findings for this specific manual show that Hybrid RAG consistently outperforms direct long-context prompting。Models like Gemini 2.5 Flash and the smaller Qwen 2.5 7B achieve high accuracy(over 85%)across all languages with RAG。This paper contributes a detailed analysis of LLM performance in a specialized industrial domain and an open framework for similar evaluations, highlighting practical trade-offs and challenges。
引用
@article{arxiv.2508.18093,
title = {Agri-Query: A Case Study on RAG vs. Long-Context LLMs for Cross-Lingual Technical Question Answering},
author = {Julius Gun and Timo Oksanen},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.18093},
year = {2026}
}