Related papers: Reply to Bernevig, Giuliano, and Laughlin

Reply to the recent comment by I.Ispolatov and M.Karttunen, cond-mat/0303564

Reply to the Comment by F. Corberi, E. Lipiello and M. Zannetti (cond-mat/0211609).

This is a reply to a comment by P. Schlottmann and A.A. Zvyagin.

Remarks on reply (cond-mat/0206368) to Johansen's comment (cond-mat/0205249)

We provide our reply to the comment by Greiter and Schuricht (cond-mat/0511607).

Comment on B.A. Bernevig, D. Giuliano, and R.B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3392 (2001).

Response to Comment by A. Bussmann-Holder (arXiv:0909.3603)

We reply to the comment by Ying Zhang and S. Das Sarma on our PRL 94, 226405 (2005).

I reply to Professor Peter van Nieuwenhuizen in connection with hep-th/0408137

We respond to invalid criticism in the recent Comment by Schneider et al. [arXiv:1407.4127v1]

A short Reply to the Comment of Prokof'ev and Svistunov, cond-mat/0504008, is given.

A reply on the comment of Bertin, Chate, Ginelli, Gregoire, Leonard and Peshkov, arxiv:1404.3950v1, in this special issue.

Comment on Article by Ferreira and Gamerman [arXiv:1509.03410].

Comment on Article by Ferreira and Gamerman [arXiv:1509.03410].

This is a brief response to a recent posting by Gross.

Reply to the Comment physics/0307134 by A. Helmstetter and D. Sornette

We remark on the validity of the concerns raised in the comment(cond-mat/0304626) by Fal'ko, Lerner, Tsyplyatyev, and Aleiner..

In this brief reply we point out to some misconceptions in C.Camacho's comment (cond-mat/9701210).

Here we reply to the comment by A. F. Volkov, F. S. Bergeret, and K. B. Efetov.

This is a reply to Professor Yehia Comments in arXiv:1305.0026