Related papers: Response to Cusin et al's comment on arXiv:1810.13…

A response to commenter Ke Lan's comment on our paper published in Nature Communications (2023)14:5782 by J. Yan et al

I comment on a recent preprint "Neutrino Velocity Anomalies: A Resolution without a Revolution" that appeared recently as arXiv:1110.0989 [hep-ph]

As a coauthor of the article mentioned in the title, I discuss the criticism in the comment of Aalseth et al. Part of the criticism is justified.

This document is a reply to arXiv:1810.11506. In that document, D\"onmez and Ba\v{z}ant raise a number of criticism on the hypotheses Critical Shear Crack Theory (CSCT). The aspects criticized have however been largely discussed in previous…

This paper was withdrawn by arXiv administrators upon request of the Chairperson and Spokesperson of the L3 Collaboration.

This is the reply to the comment arXiv:0801.4620 by Vidal, Dusuel, and Schmidt.

We demonstrate conclusively that there is no "Open Access Advantage" for papers from the Astrophysical Journal. The two to one citation advantage enjoyed by papers deposited in the arXiv e-print server is due entirely to the nature and…

We provide a reply to a comment by I. Goychuk arXiv:1708.04155, version v2 from 27 Aug 2017 (not under active consideration with Phys. Rev. Lett.), on our Letter E. Aghion, D. A. Kessler and E. Barkai, Phys. Rev. Lett., 118, 260601 (2017).

A comment to the authors' SRF Conference pre-print [1] was submitted by A. Gurevich to the arXiv [2]. In this response, we show that the arguments used in the comment are not valid. [1] arXiv:1309.3239 [2] arXiv:1309.5626

This paper is replaced by arXiv:1009.2490. The new paper includes a general impossibility result and restricted possibility results, and it has two additional authors.

We reply to the criticism raised by Volovik in his Comment (cond-mat/9805159) and by Hirschfeld et al. in their Comment (cond-mat/9806085).

This document contains a description of several of my papers, including remarks on history and connection with subsequent work. It also contains some new results and conjectures.

The authors are not satisfied about the analysis.

In the present work we reply to the Comment by Catalan and Scott (cond-mat/0607500) on two of our papers. This Comment has been rejected from publication in Physical Review Letters and, hence, our Reply is based on the cond-mat version.

This is a Comment to the recent 3 papers by S.S. Afonin

The results of a recent paper by D.J.Hinde et al., PRL 101, 092701 (2008) are discussed.

Withdrawn by arXiv administration because authors have forged affiliations and acknowledgements, and have not adequately responded to charges [hep-th/9912039] of unattributed use of verbatim material.

We regret to point out several inaccurate and misleading statements that Benedetto {\em et al.} make in their Reply to our Comment on their paper titled ``Language Trees and Zipping''.

In reply to Vaidman's Comment [arXiv:1304.6689], we show that his claim that our Protocol for Direct Counterfactual Quantum Communication [PRL 110, 170502 (2013), arXiv:1206.2042] is counterfactual only for one type of information bit is…

We show that the claims expressed in the Comment arXiv:0810.3244v1 by R.S. Decca et al against our paper, D.A.R. Dalvit and S.K. Lamoreaux, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 101}, 163203 (2008), are wrong and manifestly inconsistent with basic…