Related papers: Response to Cusin et al's comment on arXiv:1810.13…

Berger et al., published in TOPLAS 2019, is a critique of our 2014 FSE conference abstract and its archival version, the 2017 CACM paper: A Large-Scale Study of Programming Languages and Code Quality in Github. In their paper Berger et al.…

This paper is in response to a recent comment by Bellissard [arXiv:1704.02644] on the paper [Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 130201 (2017)]. It is explained that the issues raised in the comment have already been discussed in the paper and do not…

In a recent criticism (arXiv:2111.13357) of our paper arXiv:2111.09347, Drezet argues that we have forgotten to consider superpositions of detector eigenstates. However, such superpositions do not occur in the models our paper is concerned…

arXiv admin note: This submission has been removed by arXiv administrators due to unprofessional personal attack.

In these notes we provide the foundation for the deformation theoretic parts of arXiv:0807.3753 and arXiv:math/0102005.

We give a concise overview of arxiv:0812.2519 and arxiv:1412.3248. The paper contains all the main results and constructions but no proofs.

Two objections have been raised to the arguments presented in O. Cohen, Phys. Rev. A 60, 80 (1999). It is pointed out that neither objection has anything whatsoever to do with the main subject matter of that paper, and shown that both…

We reply to the criticisms of our publication (N. Hasegawa, K. Hagino, and Y. Tanimura, Phys. Lett. B808, 135693 (2020)) made by A. Ono in his recent article, arXiv:2201.02966.

We give some corrections of our paper "Primes in arithmetic progressions to large moduli"[BFI]. The corrections do not affect the statements of any of the theorems in the paper. The contents of our two sequel papers [BFI2, BFI3] also remain…

Withdrawn by arXiv administration because authors have forged affiliations and acknowledgements, and have not adequately responded to charges [hep-th/9912039] of unattributed use of verbatim material.

In this note we briefly comment a paper by Itin, Obukhov and Hehl criticising our previous paper. We show that all remarks by our critics are ill conceived or irrelevant to our approach and moreover we provide some pertinent new comments to…

We hereby reply concisely and hopefully clearly to the ongoing claims of incorrectness made by Chen et al. about our work on two-dimensional flocks.

It is shown that the Comment by Phair et al. on PRL 77, 3514 (1996) does not challenge the paper by Tõke et al. It is, in fact, consistent with all conclusions of the targeted paper. The Comment disputes claims never made.

This submission has been withdrawn by arXiv administrators due to misrepresentation of authorship.

We reply to the comment cond-mat/9902073 by Ben-Naim and Krapivsky on our paper cond-mat/9901130. We show that their arguments are incorrect, and present more numerical results to back our earlier conclusions.

The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the results about classification of quantum groups that were obtained in arXiv:1303.4046 [math.QA] and arXiv:1502.00403 [math.QA].

This reply addresses concerns expressed in a comment (arXiv:2508.16689v1) on arXiv:submit/6841332 [physics.gen-ph] 29 Sep 2025 the paper given in the title (arXiv:2501.02022v2), hereafter referred to as the paper.

The experimental findings reported in our original paper [1] (arXiv:1211.2913) have been criticized in ref.[2] (arXiv:1606.00710). We believe that the arguments brought in ref. [2] are not correct and we show evidence for this.

The article is withdrawn. Its content is contained in the final version of arXiv:0805.1634.

This is the revised version of a Comment on a paper by C. Escudero (Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 116101, 2008; arXiv:0804.1898).