Related papers: Response to Cusin et al's comment on arXiv:1810.13…

We reply to a comment of Van Enter, Kuelske and Maes (cond-mat/0005176) on our letter "Critical Behavior of the Randomly Spin-Diluted 2-d Ising Model - A Grand Ensemble Approach", Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 73}, 2268-2271 (1994).

Assertions made in a document recently deposited in the arXiv are refuted.

This thesis investigates in the use of access log data as a source of information for identifying related scientific papers. This is done for arXiv.org, the authority for publication of e-prints in several fields of physics. Compared to…

In this short note we provide clarification to the comments made in Z. Angew. Math. Phys. (2018) 69:64 on our work "Finiteness of corner vortices" [ Z. Angew. Math. Phys. (2018) 69:37].

We respond to two sets of criticisms of our analysis in Noack & Niven, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 700, 187--213 (2012), made by Di Vita, Journal of Thermodynamics & Catalysis, 3: e108 (2012). We show that the criticisms are incorrect and…

The paper comments on "Quantifying long-term scientific impact". It indicates that there is a mistake of [D. S. Wang , C. Song, A. L. Barabasi, Quantifying long-term scientific impact, Science 342, 127 (2013), arXiv:1306.3293].

This article statistically analyses how the citation impact of articles deposited in the Condensed Matter section of the preprint server ArXiv (hosted by Cornell University), and subsequently published in a scientific journal, compares to…

I refute the criticisms of hep-ph/0311241 raised in hep-ph/0312151.

Comment on ``On Random Scan Gibbs Samplers'' [arXiv:0808.3852]

We comment on the derivation of an analytical solution presented in arXiv:1309.1629, show that it belongs to a family of separable solutions previously constructed in arXiv:gr-qc/0109002, and question its relevance to critical collapse.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors after discussing its content with Dr. J. Madsen.

A short Reply to the Comment of Prokof'ev and Svistunov, cond-mat/0504008, is given.

I provide some comments on Arithmetic Teichmuller Spaces constructed in my paper arXiv:2106.11452.

This is a Reply to the Comment by Vaidman in arXiv:2306.16756 on the paper: R. B. Griffiths, Phys. Rev. A 107, 062219 (2023)

In this brief note we comment on the recent results presented in arXiv:1812.08736v1

Samuely et al. (cond-mat/0503153) make the strong claim that our letter is 'contradicting several established experimental results'. As we will show below this is not justified and the claims from are based on a misinterpretation of our…

In this brief reply we point out to some misconceptions in C.Camacho's comment (cond-mat/9701210).

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to text overlap with arXiv:1102.5004, as well as omission of proper citations to arXiv:1110.4655 and arXiv:1111.0313

In this note we respond to Mouschovias and Kassis criticisms that our paper "Testing Magnetic Star Formation Theory" is flawed. We stand fully behind our paper.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author. The most updated version can be accessed by arXiv:1806.07290.