Related papers: Comment on "Disassembling the Clockwork Mechanism"
We present a critical analysis of what is called Relational Mechanics, as it has been presented in a book thus entitled, which has been recently reviewed in this journal.
In a brief note posted recently, the authors of arXiv:1503.07813 raised some concerns on our arxiv:1502.03821, recently published in Nature Physics. We thank them for the interest in our work and respond here to their criticisms.
Below we analyze the `critic' statements made in the Preprint arXiv:1301.1828v1 [nucl-th]. The doubtful scientific argumentation of the authors of the Preprint arXiv:1301.1828v1 [nucl-th] is also discussed.
We reply to the comment [arXiv:0903.5110] on our paper "Mechanism of Terahertz Electromagnetic Emission from Intrinsic Josephson Junctions" [arXiv:0810.5268].
This paper puts forward a broad critical analysis of the concept of physical time. Clock effect is conceived as a consequence of the variation of the gravitational or pseudo gravitational potential, and it is remarked that only some real…
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors after discussing its content with Dr. J. Madsen.
A review article on perturbation theory
Comment on the paper P. E. Jonsson, H. Yoshino, and P. Nordblad, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 097201 (2002), also cond-mat/0203444.
I give a comment on arXiv:1802.01804v3 [hep-ph]
Withdrawn by arXiv administration because the text and equations were plagiarized from chapter 10 of the BaBar Physics Book http://www.slac.stanford.edu/pubs/slacreports/slac-r-504.html See also hep-ph/0304045
This is a response to the commentaries on "CoRR: A Computing Research Repository".
The title paper is discussed critically. There are major problems with incorrect statements, irrelevant citations, incorrect mathematics leading to incorrect results, which are compared with our own simulations.
This paper has been withdrawn, as it should not have been a new submission. Please instead see the latest version of arXiv:0904.0436.
In this note, it is shown that the results claimed in the paper [1]---as well as the examples presented there---are, unfortunately, incorrect.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to text overlap with arXiv:1102.5004, as well as omission of proper citations to arXiv:1110.4655 and arXiv:1111.0313
This is a comment on arXiv:1402.6767 (2014) by Y. Imura, T. Okubo, S. Morita, and K. Okunishi.
In arXiv:2209.00561 our treatment arXiv:2208.03736 of effects of particles emitted together with neutrinos on neutrino wave packets is criticized on several grounds. We show here that this criticism is based on misinterpretation of our…
This is a comment on Chen et al Letter PRL,100, 232002 (2008).
this is a duplicate submission(original is arXiv:1612.02141). Hence want to withdraw it
We discuss the relationship between modern time-dependent density functional theory and earlier time-periodic versions, and why the criticisms in a recent paper (Chem. Phys. Lett. {\bf 433} (2006) 204) of our earlier analysis (Chem. Phys.…