Related papers: Comment on "Disassembling the Clockwork Mechanism"

Critiques presented by P. Grassberger in Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 140601 (2005) are addressed.

We reply to the critiques of our paper arXiv:1210.5501 by the DAMA collaboration which appeared in arXiv:1210.6199 and arXiv:1211.6346. Our original claim that the observed background levels are likely to require a large modulation fraction…

We modify Hamiltonian mechanics. We reformulate the law of conservation of energy.

We provide a counterexample to a crucial lemma in the ICALP 2008 paper "Simpler Linear-Time Modular Decomposition Via Recursive Factorizing Permutations", invalidating the algorithm described there.

Comment withdrawn.

This paper has been withdrawn. See published paper http://arxiv.org/math.HO/0512390

This paper has been withdrawn by the author because overcame by arXiv:0910.4694

A short reply to Jarzynski's comment cond-mat/0509344 on my paper ``Flaw of Jarzynski's equality when applied to systems with several degrees of freedom'' (cond--mat/0508721) is presented.

It is shown how possible corrections to ordinary quantum mechanics described by the Lindblad equation might be detected by exploiting the great precision of atomic clocks.

Comments on the article "Pulsar dynamics: magnetic dipole model revisited".

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to the appearence of enlarged version with one new author name more (hep-ph/0012293).

The content of this paper is now available as part of arXiv:0902.1502

Recent research on the decline in the paper disruption index (D-index) has sparked heated debates among scholars and garnered significant attention from policymakers and research institution leaders globally. To bridge the gap between…

A recent Comment [arXiv:0811.2790] on the Letter 'Quantum Bounce and Cosmic Recall' by the authors is shown to arise from an incorrect understanding of the issues at hand and of our analysis. The conclusions of Bojowald's Comment are shown…

Brief response to a Reply [arXiv:1005.2615] on our Comments [arXiv:1005.0838] on XENON100 recent results [arXiv:1005.0380].

This is a reply to the comment from Patrick Bruno (arXiv:1211.4792) on our paper (Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 163001 (2012)).

A critical discussion of recent attempts to revise the modern physics history is presented.

We comment on the latest paper by M. Silaev [Phys. Rev. B {\bf 99}, 224511 (2019)]

Comment on the paper "Novel Convective Instabilities in a Magnetic Fluid" by W. Luo, T. Du, and J. Huang, Phys. Rev. Lett., v.82, p.4134 (1999).

We refute the criticism expressed in a comment by P. Talkner and P. H\"anggi [Phys. Rev. E 102, 066101 (2020)] on our paper Phys. Rev. E 101, 050101(R) (2020). We first make clear that our paper is free of any technical mistakes. We then…