Related papers: Comment on Article by Ferreira and Gamerman

Comment on Article by Ferreira and Gamerman [arXiv:1509.03410].

Response to Comment by A. Bussmann-Holder (arXiv:0909.3603)

Comment on "Citation Statistics" [arXiv:0910.3529]

Comment on "Citation Statistics" [arXiv:0910.3529]

Reply to the Comment by F. Corberi, E. Lipiello and M. Zannetti (cond-mat/0211609).

This is a Comment to the recent review by L. Glozman, hep-ph/0701081

Comment on "Harold Jeffreys's Theory of Probability Revisited" [arXiv:0804.3173]

Comment on "Harold Jeffreys's Theory of Probability Revisited" [arXiv:0804.3173]

Comment on "Harold Jeffreys's Theory of Probability Revisited" [arXiv:0804.3173]

Comment on "Harold Jeffreys's Theory of Probability Revisited" [arXiv:0804.3173]

We provide our reply to the comment by Greiter and Schuricht (cond-mat/0511607).

Comment on ``On Random Scan Gibbs Samplers'' [arXiv:0808.3852]

This is a comment on two recent arXiv postings.

Comment on ``Lancaster Probabilities and Gibbs Sampling'' [arXiv:0808.3852]

Reply to the Comment physics/0307134 by A. Helmstetter and D. Sornette

We reply to the comment by Ying Zhang and S. Das Sarma on our PRL 94, 226405 (2005).

This is a reply to the paper by S.C.Benjamin, quant-ph/0008127.

Remarks on reply (cond-mat/0206368) to Johansen's comment (cond-mat/0205249)

Discussion of ``Statistical analysis of an archeological find'' by Andrey Feuerverger [arXiv:0804.0079]

This note is the follow up to a paper by M. Waldschmidt.