Related papers: Comment on Article by Ferreira and Gamerman

Comment on "Quantifying the Fraction of Missing Information for Hypothesis Testing in Statistical and Genetic Studies" [arXiv:1102.2774]

Contributed discussion and rejoinder to "Geodesic Monte Carlo on Embedded Manifolds" (arXiv:1301.6064)

Lecture notes on Finsler Geometry

Comment on "New Mean-Field Theory of the tt't"J Model Applied to the High-Tc Superconductors" by T. C. Ribeiro and X.-G. Wen [cond-mat/0410750; Physical Review Letters 95, 057001 (2005)].

The content of this paper is now available as part of arXiv:0902.1502

This combines a reply to the Comment [hep-th/0203067 v1] by A. N. Vaidya and R. de L. Rodrigues with an erratum to our Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 210405 (2001)]

We give a simple explanaition of classical boson-fermion correspondence.

Some notes and observations on analytic functions defined on an annulus

A small comment on the paper with the mentioned title by Carl M. Bender, Dorje C. Brody and Hugh F. Jones.

We reply to the preceding Comment by E. van Beveren et al., arXiv:0811.2589 [hep-ph].

A Comment on the Letter by C. R. Galley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 174301 (2013).

This paper is intended to help the readers to understand the article: Y. Hirashita, Least-Squares Prices of Games, Preprint (arXiv:math.OC/0703079).

Comment on ``Wigner phase space description of a Morse oscillator''

In this paper, we make some remarks on Jos\'e Espinar's paper "Finite index operators on surfaces" [\texttt{arXiv:0911.3767}, to appear in Journal of Geometric Analysis (2011)].

To appear in Phys. Rev. Lett. together with the author's Reply.

It is shown that criticism of my paper arXiv:0801.0656 Phys. Rev. Lett, vol. 101, 163202 (2008) by the authors of Comment arXiv:0810.3243v1 is wrong and that their main arguments are in contradiction with established concepts of statistical…

Reply to ``Comment on [Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 630 (1998)]''

This is the Reply to the revised Comment [Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 139601; arXiv:0810.4791] by Joachim Krug on our paper: C. Escudero, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 116101 (2008); arXiv:0804.1898.

We comment on the recent paper by N.A. Tornqvist and M. Roos published in Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1575 (1996).

We offer o reply for the comments of Rapisarda et al. cond-mat/0601409 on our letter "Entropy of Classical Systems with Long Range Interactios", published in Phys. Rev. Lett. Vol 95 (2005) 190601.