Related papers: Comment on Article by Ferreira and Gamerman

Comment: Bayesian Checking of the Second Levels of Hierarchical Models [arXiv:0802.0743]

Comment: Bayesian Checking of the Second Levels of Hierarchical Models [arXiv:0802.0743]

Reply to Bernevig, Giuliano, and Laughlin: cond-mat/0410147

Reply to the recent comment by I.Ispolatov and M.Karttunen, cond-mat/0303564

We respond to the criticisms of a recent paper of Buchert et al. [arXiv:1505.07800]

Withdrawn -- a revised version will appear in due course.

Comment on ``Microarrays, Empirical Bayes and the Two-Groups Model'' [arXiv:0808.0572]

Comment on ``Microarrays, Empirical Bayes and the Two-Groups Model'' [arXiv:0808.0572]

This is a comment on the paper arXiv:1410.2840 by Ji and Jin, to appear in the AOAS.

Discussion of ``Statistical analysis of an archeological find'' by Andrey Feuerverger [arXiv:0804.0079]

Discussion of ``Statistical analysis of an archeological find'' by Andrey Feuerverger [arXiv:0804.0079]

Discussion of ``Statistical analysis of an archeological find'' by Andrey Feuerverger [arXiv:0804.0079]

Discussion of ``Statistical analysis of an archeological find'' by Andrey Feuerverger [arXiv:0804.0079]

This note is my comment on Glenn Shafer's discussion paper "Testing by betting", together with two online appendices comparing p-values and betting scores.

Comment on ``Microarrays, Empirical Bayes and the Two-Group Model'' [arXiv:0808.0572]

This article is a reply to the Comment by D. Spemann et al (arXiv:1204.2992) in response to our paper 'Revealing common artifacts due to ferromagnetic inclusions in highly oriented pyrolytic graphite' (EPL, 97 (2012) 47001).

This is a reply to Professor Yehia Comments in arXiv:1305.0026

Discussion of ``Statistical analysis of an archeological find'' by Andrey Feuerverger [arXiv:0804.0079]

I give a comment on arXiv:1802.01804v3 [hep-ph]

A comment on the paper Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 161116 (2014).