Related papers: Errata for Stochastic calculus for symmetric Marko…
Correction to Annals of Applied Statistics 1 (2007) 17--35 [doi:10.1214/07-AOAS114]
The content of this paper is now available as part of arXiv:0802.2019
The revised version contains two additional references i.e. [13], [14] w.r.t. to the original paper. Furthermore Eq. (33) in [11] at the end of the paragraph below (3.17) must be Eq. (33) in [10]. Misprints in the list of references are…
In the note two errors in Low and Lapsley's article "Optimization Flow Control, I: Basic Algorithm and Convergence", "IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking", 7(6), pp. 861-874, 1999, are shown. Because of these errors the proofs of both…
A significant mathematical error is identified and corrected in a recent highly-cited paper on oscillatory flows of second-grade fluids [Fetecau & Fetecau (2005). Int. J. Eng. Sci., 43, 781--789]. The corrected solutions are shown to agree…
This is a preprint of the article arXiv:2004.10242
Short review article on quantum information processing accepted for Supplement III, Encyclopaedia of Mathematics (publication expected Summer 2001). See also http://www.wkap.nl/series.htm/ENM
This paper has been withdrawn by the author. The most updated version can be accessed by arXiv:1806.07290.
The cited article contains a serious flaw. A remedy is found in articles by other authors.
The content of this preprint together with additional material appears now in 0706.2154.
In this note, it is shown that the results claimed in the paper [1]---as well as the examples presented there---are, unfortunately, incorrect.
Boris Shoikhet noticed that the proof of lemma 1 in section 2.3 of math.QA/0504420 contains an error. In this note I give a correct proof of this lemma which was suggested to me by Dmitry Tamarkin. The correction does not change the results…
We point out that our scheme in manuscript quant-ph/0104127 is misunderstood by Alexander Blais and Andre-Marie S. Tremblay in their recent e-print quant-ph/0105006.
It is shown that criticism of my paper arXiv:0801.0656 Phys. Rev. Lett, vol. 101, 163202 (2008) by the authors of Comment arXiv:0810.3243v1 is wrong and that their main arguments are in contradiction with established concepts of statistical…
We correct an error in a technical lemma of Drees and Rootz\'en (2010) [arXiv:0910.0343] and discuss consequences for applications.
The calculation presented in "A neoclassical calculation of rotation profiles and comparison with DIII-D measurements" by Stacey, Johnson, and Mandrekas, [Physics of Plasmas, 13, (2006)], contains several errors, including the neglect of…
Some mathematical errors of the paper commented upon [W.-M. Suen, Phys. Rev. D 40, (1989) 315] are corrected.
This article appeared in the September 2024 issue (Vol. 31, No. 3) of the Bulletin of the International Society for Bayesian Analysis (ISBA).
This is a revised version of Sh:430, section 6.
This paper is superseded by arXiv:1106.3363.