Related papers: Errata for Stochastic calculus for symmetric Marko…

In this note, the correction to the proof of one theorem in some our previous paper [arXiv:1302.0589] will be given.

This note contains a correction to the paper, ``Local contribution to the Lefschetz fixed point formula'', Inv. Math. 111 (1993), pp. 1-33.

The authors of preprint arXiv:2009.00286 and paper Appl. Phys. Lett. 117, 130501 (2020), Y. Sivan and Y. Dubi, made several wrong and inconsistent comments on our papers [J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 16616-16631 (2013), ACS Photonics 4 (11),…

The aim of this article is to prove that diffusion processes in $\mathbb{R}^d$ with a drift can be approximated by suitable Markov chains on $n^{-1}\mathbb{Z}^d$. Moreover, we investigate sufficient conditions on the conductances which…

Misprints in eq. (7), which propagate up to eq. (13), are corrected. References are updated.

The paper by Bowen, Mancini, Fessatidis, and Murawski (2012 Phys. Scr. {\bf 85}, 065005) demonstrates in a dramatic fashion the serious difficulties that can arise when one rushes to perform numerical studies before understanding the…

This is a comment on [G. Knight and R. Klages, Phys. Rev. E 84, 041135 (2011); also available at arXiv:1107.5293v2 [math-ph]].

A Comment on the paper "Conservative Quantum Computing" by M. Ozawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 057902 (2002). The author replies in Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 089802 (2003).

This paper specifies a notation for Markov decision processes.

Diffusive approximations of Markov jump processes often fail to accurately capture large fluctuations. This is confounding, as the rare events triggered by these large fluctuations, such as the failure of electronic memories, are often the…

An algorithm for estimating quasi-stationary distribution of finite state space Markov chains has been proven in a previous paper. Now this paper proves a similar algorithm that works for general state space Markov chains under very general…

In the paper [Muhammad Aslam Noor, Khalida Inayat Noor, Three-step iterative methods for nonlinear equations, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 183 (2006), pp. 322-327 ], Authors presented an algorithm (\textbf{Algorithm 2.3}) and stated…

This is an erratum to our paper in Physical Review D82:022004,2010, corresponding to preprint: arXiv:1003.2961 .

Short review article on quantum computation accepted for Supplement III, Encyclopaedia of Mathematics (publication expected Summer 2001). See also http://www.wkap.nl/series.htm/ENM

This manuscripts corrects some minor error in the paper, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 6 1893 (1991)

In this correspondence, it is given a correction to Theorem 4 in Y. Hu, and G. Xiao, "Generalized Self-Shrinking Generator," IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 50, No. 4, pp. 714-719, April 2004.

A simple linear algebraic explanation of the algorithm in "A Spectral Algorithm for Learning Hidden Markov Models" (COLT 2009). Most of the content is in Figure 2; the text just makes everything precise in four nearly-trivial claims.

Erratum to "From Uncertainty Principles to Wegner Estimates".

This note corrects conditions in Proposition 3.4 and Theorem 5.2(ii) and comments on imprecisions in Propositions 4.2 and 4.4 in Fissler and Ziegel (2016).

After the publication of [Compos. Math. 156 (2020), no. 4, 822-861], Andrew Putman pointed out a mistake in our paper and helped us fix it. In this note, we will explain what this mistake is and how to fix it.