Related papers: Second comment to "Invariance of the tunneling met…
Comment on the paper Schiavoni et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 094101 (2003).
We show that the reply by Tamburini et al (2012 New J. Phys. 14 118002) to our previous comment (2012 New J. Phys. 14 118001) on the experiment reported in (2012 New J. Phys. 14 033001) actually does not invalidate any of the issues raised…
Two objections have been raised to the arguments presented in O. Cohen, Phys. Rev. A 60, 80 (1999). It is pointed out that neither objection has anything whatsoever to do with the main subject matter of that paper, and shown that both…
Discussion on "Brownian distance covariance" by G\'{a}bor J. Sz\'{e}kely and Maria L. Rizzo [arXiv:1010.0297]
Discussion on "Brownian distance covariance" by G\'{a}bor J. Sz\'{e}kely and Maria L. Rizzo [arXiv:1010.0297]
Discussion on "Brownian distance covariance" by G\'{a}bor J. Sz\'{e}kely and Maria L. Rizzo [arXiv:1010.0297]
The instability of transverse wobbling claim is disputed.
Marchildon's arguments against my earlier work are refuted.
Our analysis based on analytical and numerical calculations leads to conclusion that the promising results obtained in [F. Bouchard, J. Harris, H. Mand, R. W. Boyd, and E. Karimi, Optica 3, 351, 2016] are questionable in several respects.
This article corrects two mistakes in the article "Coarse homology theories" [math.AT/0106183].
Rejoinder to "Brownian distance covariance" by G\'abor J. Sz\'ekely and Maria L. Rizzo [arXiv:1010.0297]
This article is a response to the recent Worrying Trends in Econophysics critique written by four respected theoretical economists. Two of the four have written books and papers that provide very useful critical analyses of the shortcomings…
Recently the ``Fluctuation theorem'' has been criticized and incorrect incorrect contents have been atributed to it. Here I reestablish and comment the original statements.
This Comment identifies errors in the formalism/implementation reported in Ref. 1 and discusses some aspects of that work that were not fully specified in the original publication. This Comment also provides reference numerical results for…
In this comment we point out numerous errors in the paper of Alhaidari cited in the title.
We make two tiny corrections to our previous paper with the same title, and also obtain, as a bonus, something new.
This is a supplement to the article "Markov Chain Monte Carlo Based on Deterministic Transformations" available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.5850
We reply to a comment by A. Patrascioiu and E. Seiler appeared in hep-lat/9608138 on our paper hep-lat/9608002.
The purpose of this note is to correct an error in a paper of M. Cowling, G. Fendler and J.J.F. Fournier, and to give a counterexample to a conjecture of J.-L. Rubio de Francia.
An alternative proof is given for the main result of the article referred to in the title and published in ECP (2024). The proof exploits the theory of regenerative composition structures due to Gnedin and Pitman. The present article is a…