Related papers: Second comment to "Invariance of the tunneling met…

In the note an error in Low and Lapsley's article ("Optimization Flow Control, I: Basic Algorithm and Convergence", IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 7(6), pp. 861-874, 1999) is pointed out. Because of this error the proof of the Theorem…

We address the three points raised by the authors of the above Comment.

A recent paper of Trandafir and Cabello [Phys. Rev. A, 111, 022408 (2025)] contains a number of errors, inconsistencies, and inefficiencies. They are too numerous to be listed here, so we identify and discuss them in the main body of the…

Here we give our reply to the comment by Sibirtsev et al on our paper ``Mass and K-Lambda Coupling of the N*(1535)".

We clarify the relationship between the conclusions of the previous Comment of A. Helfer [1] and that of our Brief Report [arXiv:0906.5315]

I criticize the claim, made in a recent article [C. M. Bender and L. R. Mead, Eur. J. Phys. 20, 117 (1999)], that in order to obtain the correct cross section for the scattering from a two-dimensional delta-function potential one must…

The paper comments on "Quantifying long-term scientific impact". It indicates that there is a mistake of [D. S. Wang , C. Song, A. L. Barabasi, Quantifying long-term scientific impact, Science 342, 127 (2013), arXiv:1306.3293].

Herein I respond to the criticism and to the complains by Benestad (Pattern Recogn. Phys. 1, 91-92, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/prp-1-91-2013) of Scafetta (Pattern Recogn. Phys. 1, 37-57, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/prp-1-37-2013)…

We refute the criticism expressed in a comment by P. Talkner and P. H\"anggi [Phys. Rev. E 102, 066101 (2020)] on our paper Phys. Rev. E 101, 050101(R) (2020). We first make clear that our paper is free of any technical mistakes. We then…

In this short note we provide clarification to the comments made in Z. Angew. Math. Phys. (2018) 69:64 on our work "Finiteness of corner vortices" [ Z. Angew. Math. Phys. (2018) 69:37].

This is a comment on Phys. Rev. A 67, 022104(2003).

Our comprehensive analysis suggests the heating origin of key findings by the authors of the commented letter, hence rendering irrelevant their conclusions.

In this article we give a survey on open problems and conjectures concerning L^2-invariants. We cover the whole portfolio and not only certain aspects as they are considered in the previous more specialized (and within their scope more…

New cases of the multiplicity conjecture are considered.

In this brief reply we point out to some misconceptions in C.Camacho's comment (cond-mat/9701210).

This is an analysis of some aspects of an old but still controversial topic, superluminal quantum tunneling. Some features of quantum tunneling described in literature, such as definition of the tunneling time and a frequency range of a…

The present note points out a number of errors, omissions, redundancies and arbitrary deviations from the standard terminology in the paper "Resource placement in Cartesian product of networks," by N. Imani, H. Sarbazi-Azad and A.Y. Zomaya…

We respond to the recent article by S. Goldstein, R. Tumulka, and N. Zangh\`i [arXiv:2309.11835] concerning the spin-dependent arrival-time distributions reported in [S. Das and D. D\"urr, Sci. Rep. 9: 2242 (2019)].

A comment on the paper "Truncated Schwinger-Dyson Equations and Gauge Covariance in QED3", Few-Body Syst. 41, 185 (2007) [hep-ph/0511291].

A brief comment on A variational Bayesian approach for inverse problems with skew-t error distributions (Guha et al., Journal of Computational Physics 301 (2015) 377-393) is given in this letter.