Related papers: Second comment to "Invariance of the tunneling met…

We reply to a comment by Averin and Korotkov http://uk.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0404549 on Stace and Barrett, PRL 92, 136802 (2004) http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v92/e136802, showing that their specific criticisms are unfounded, and…

The interpretation of tunneling data in a recent Letter by Zasadzinski et al. is incorrect.

A comment has been recently posted on the arXiv (arXiv:1902.07504) that discuss our recent work on encircling multiple exceptional points in Nat. Commun. 9, 4808 (2018). In that comment, the authors claim that our approach is prone to…

A number of misleading or incorrect comments by C.Giunti on seven arXiv preprints that I have written on the theory of neutrino oscillations are discussed. The essential new features of my approach are also briefly reviewed

We comment on the latest paper [K.-H. Ding, Z.-G. Zhu, and J. Berakdar, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 24, 266003 (2012)].

We continue the work of [4, 2, 3], in which we discuss published assertions that are incorrect or incorrectly proven; that are severely limited or reduce to triviality; or that we improve upon.

This comment points out that the recent paper by Maki and Haas [Phys. Rev. B {\bf 67}, 020510 (2003)] is completely wrong.

This work is a continuation of what was done in a previous paper and strongly connected to the recent work of U. Abel and I. Rasa [arXiv:1707.00127]

We continue a discussion of published assertions that are incorrect, incorrectly proven, or trivial, in the theory of fixed points in digital topology.

We reply to the criticism raised by Volovik in his Comment (cond-mat/9805159) and by Hirschfeld et al. in their Comment (cond-mat/9806085).

Reply to the Comment by F. Corberi, E. Lipiello and M. Zannetti (cond-mat/0211609).

We reply to the criticisms of our publication (N. Hasegawa, K. Hagino, and Y. Tanimura, Phys. Lett. B808, 135693 (2020)) made by A. Ono in his recent article, arXiv:2201.02966.

Reply to the Comment of J.J. Alonso and J.F. Fernandez on the paper "'Hole-digging' in ensembles of tunneling molecular magnets" of I.S. Tupitsyn, P.C.E. Stamp and N.V. Prokof'ev (Phys. Rev. B 69, 132406, (2004)).

We reply to the comment by Ying Zhang and S. Das Sarma on our PRL 94, 226405 (2005).

Some remarks are made on the articles by N.Milosevic, V.P.Krainov, T.Brabec and our papers are about problem of semiclassical theory of tunnel ionization.

We review the derivations and conclusions made in Caravelli and Modesto (2010 \textit{Class. Quantum Grav.} \textbf{27} 245022, arXiv:1006.0232) and show that most of the analysis performed there is not valid.

This note provides a brief guide to the current state of the literature on Tarski's problems with emphasis on features that distinguish the approach based on combinatorial and algorithmic group theory from the topological approach to…

The arguments of the above article [arXiv:0910.3934] do not apply to the papers which it criticizes, and contain several key errors, including a fundamental misunderstanding about the equivalence principle.

A comment on a misleading statement contained in [Phys. Rev. A 97, 062115 (2018)]. v2: a typo corrected

We reply to the comment of Chudnovsky and Garanin on the tunneling rate in Mn_{12}.