Related papers: Comment: Understanding OR, PS and DR

The above hep-th posting purports -- erroneously -- to be a comment on a Note by me in gr-qc.

Remarks on reply (cond-mat/0206368) to Johansen's comment (cond-mat/0205249)

Comment on "Quantifying the Fraction of Missing Information for Hypothesis Testing in Statistical and Genetic Studies" [arXiv:1102.2774]

Comment on "Quantifying the Fraction of Missing Information for Hypothesis Testing in Statistical and Genetic Studies" [arXiv:1102.2774]

It is shown that criticism of my paper arXiv:0801.0656 Phys. Rev. Lett, vol. 101, 163202 (2008) by the authors of Comment arXiv:0810.3243v1 is wrong and that their main arguments are in contradiction with established concepts of statistical…

This is a comment on Phys. Rev. A 67, 022104(2003).

In this note we present a corregindium to our paper "Krull dimension, Overrings and Semistar operations of an integral Domain", Journal of Algebra, 321 (2009), 1497--1509.

This is a quick survey of theoretical and experimental efforts to understand and identify the Odderon.

This is a comment on Chen et al Letter PRL,100, 232002 (2008).

This is a comment on "Universal Fluctuations in Correlated Systems", by Bramwell et al, Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 3744 (2000.

Informal seminar notes explaining the ideas in math.DS/0411344 and math.DS/0411345.

In this short note we present some remarks and conjectures on two of Erd\"os's open problems in number theory.

A reply to the commentaries of Yana (2013), and some jots on information theory.

Comment on "Efficiency of Isothermal Molecular Machines at Maximum Power" (PRL 108, 210602 (2012), arXiv:1201.6396)

The Comments are devoted to the paper ``Solutions of Multitime Reaction-Diffusion PDE'' (Mathematics, vol. 10 (2022), 3623), in which main results are misleading and can be derived in a simple way from those obtained earlier. Moreover, it…

The paper (as posted originally) contains several errors. It has been subsequently split into two papers, the corrected (and accepted for publication) versions appear in the archive as papers cs.CC/0503082 and cs.DM/0503083.

The authors of the Comment ascribe us claims never made while moderating their own previous unsubstantiated statements.

Explicit expression for quasi-triviality of scalar non-linear PDE is under consideration.

We reply to the comment arXiv:quant-ph/0702060 on our letter arXiv:quant-ph/0603120 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 100402 (2006)]

The letter by Mark Perakh entitled "DEFINING COMPLEXITY: A Commentary to a paper by Charles H. Bennett" is here archived with the permission of the author. This letter was downloaded from the site "On Talk Reason,…