Related papers: Comment: Understanding OR, PS and DR
Discussion of ``Least angle regression'' by Efron et al. [math.ST/0406456]
Discussion of ``Least angle regression'' by Efron et al. [math.ST/0406456]
The aim of this communication is to correct inaccurate statements presented in a Commentary on the paper titled: "Radiation forces and torque on a rigid elliptical cylinder in acoustical plane progressive and (quasi)standing waves with…
We comment on the paper "Teleportation with a uniformly accelerated partner" (quant-ph/0302179).
Some formulas and speculations are presented relative to integrable systems and quantum mechanics.
This paper is a survey discussing Information Retrieval concepts, methods, and applications. It goes deep into the document and query modelling involved in IR systems, in addition to pre-processing operations such as removing stop words and…
A review article on perturbation theory
We consider the couplings of RR fields with open string sector for $Dp$-${\overline{Dp}}$ backgrounds of various $p$. Proposed approach, based on the approximation of the open string algebra by the algebra of differential operators,…
We suggest new types and interpretation of complex and hypercomplex numbers for which the commutative, associative, and distributive laws and the norm axioms are trivially satisfied.
Comment on ``The 2005 Neyman Lecture: Dynamic Indeterminism in Science'' [arXiv:0808.0620]
Comment on ``The 2005 Neyman Lecture: Dynamic Indeterminism in Science'' [arXiv:0808.0620]
A polemical article evaluating string theory from the point of view of a quantum field theorist working in a mathematics department. Comments to the author are encouraged.
The authors of preprint arXiv:2009.00286 and paper Appl. Phys. Lett. 117, 130501 (2020), Y. Sivan and Y. Dubi, made several wrong and inconsistent comments on our papers [J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 16616-16631 (2013), ACS Photonics 4 (11),…
I reply to the comment by Dr S. Nishigaki (hep-th/0007042) to my papers Phys. Rev. D61 (2000) 056005 and Phys. Rev. D62 (2000) 016005.
I respond to the Bernard et al. comment on my letter ``Chiral anomalies and rooted staggered fermions.''
I reply to Professor Peter van Nieuwenhuizen in connection with hep-th/0408137
This paper has been withdrawn because the content has been substantially improved in a later paper, arXiv:0806.1165.
Reply to arXiv:1903.09201.
A Comment on the Letter by O. Viehmann, J. von Delft, and F. Marquardt [Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 107}, 113602 (2011)].
Rejoinder to ``Boosting Algorithms: Regularization, Prediction and Model Fitting'' [arXiv:0804.2752]