Related papers: Comment: Understanding OR, PS and DR

This is a revised version of Sh:430, section 6.

Some personal thoughts on Sklar's theorem and copulas after reading the original paper (Sklar, 1959) in French.

Rejoinder to ``The Dantzig selector: Statistical estimation when $p$ is much larger than $n$'' [math/0506081]

This is no longer available.

In a recent paper, Vink et al. analyzed some spectropolarimetry data of O-type stars. Here we comment on our disagreement with some points presented in this paper, with the hope of helping to fully grasp the scientific implication of these…

Comment on "Approaching human language with complex networks" by Cong & Liu

Comment on The Place of Death in the Quality of Life [math.ST/0612783]

Remarks on mathematical proof and the practice of mathematics.

Reply to the recent comment by I.Ispolatov and M.Karttunen, cond-mat/0303564

We review definitions and basic properties of operads, PROPs and algebras over these structures.

Rejoinder: Classifier Technology and the Illusion of Progress [math.ST/0606441]

Comment on "Biases in the Quasar Mass-Luminosity Plane"

One can find some comments related to the isospectral issue

Comment on ``Demystifying Double Robustness: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating a Population Mean from Incomplete Data'' [arXiv:0804.2958]

Comment on ``Demystifying Double Robustness: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating a Population Mean from Incomplete Data'' [arXiv:0804.2958]

This is a reply to the Comment on 'Spin Decoherence in Superconducting Atom Chips' [arXiv:quant-ph/0610095 (2006)].

These are the preparatory notes for a Science & Music essay, "Playing by numbers", appeared in Nature 453 (2008) 988-989.

A comment on ``Comment on ``Standard Model Mass Spectrum and Interactions In The Holomorphic Unified Field Theory""

comment on cond-mat/97063007 and cond-mat/9707289

Comment in response to Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 046401 (2014)