The Eater and the Mover Game

This paper studies the idea of ``deception by motion'' through a two-player dynamic game played between a Mover who must retrieve resources at a goal location, and an Eater who can consume resources at two candidate goals. The Mover seeks to minimize the resource consumption at the true goal, and the Eater tries to maximize it. While the Mover has the knowledge about the true goal, the Eater cannot differentiate between the two candidates. Unlike existing works on deceptive motion control that measures the deceptiveness through the quality of inference made by a distant observer (an estimator), we incorporate their actions to directly measure the efficacy of deception through the outcome of the game. An equilibrium concept is then proposed without the notion of an estimator. We further identify a pair of equilibrium strategies and demonstrate that if the Eater optimizes for the worst-case scenario, hiding the intention (deception by ambiguity) is still effective, whereas trying to fake the true goal (deception by exaggeration) is not.