English

SM with four generations: Selected implications for rare B and K decays

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology 2014-11-20 v2 High Energy Physics - Experiment

Abstract

We extend our recent work and study implications of the Standard Model with four generations (SM4) for rare B and K decays. We again take seriously the several 2-3 σ\sigma anomalies seen in B, BsB_s decays and interpret them in the context of this simple extension of the SM. SM4 is also of course of considerable interest for its potential relevance to dynamical electroweak symmetry breaking and to baryogenesis. Using experimental information from processes such as BXsγB \to X_s \gamma, BdB_d and BsB_s mixings, indirect CP-violation from KLππK_L \to \pi \pi etc along with oblique corrections, we constrain the relevant parameter space of the SM4, and find mtm_{t'} of about 400-600 GeV with a mixing angle VtbVts| V_{t'b}^*V_{t's}| in the range of about (0.05 to 1.4)×102\times 10^{-2} and with an appreciable CP-odd associated phase, are favored by the current data. Given the unique role of the CP asymmetry in BsψϕB_s \to \psi \phi due to its gold-plated nature, correlation of that with many other interesting observables, including the semileptonic asymmetry (ASLA_{SL}) are studied in SM4. We also identify several processes, such as BXsννˉB \to X_s \nu \bar\nu, KLπ0ννˉK_L \to \pi^0 \nu \bar \nu etc, that are significantly different in SM4 from the SM. Experimentally the very distinctive process Bsμ+μB_s\to \mu^+\mu^- is also discussed; the branching ratio can be larger or smaller than in SM, (3.24.2)×109(3.2 \to 4.2)\times 10^{-9}, by a factor of O(3){\cal{O}}(3).

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1002.0595,
  title  = {SM with four generations: Selected implications for rare B and K decays},
  author = {Amarjit Soni and Ashutosh Kumar Alok and Anjan Giri and Rukmani Mohanta and Soumitra Nandi},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1002.0595},
  year   = {2014}
}

Comments

v2: 49 pages, 20 eps figures, Corrected some typos, added few references and minor changes with regard to direct CP in K pi. Also some added information to facilitate direct comparison with Buras et al, arXiv:1002.2126.

R2 v1 2026-06-21T14:42:38.220Z