English

Simultaneous Explanation of the $R_K$ and $R(D^{(*)})$ Puzzles

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology 2015-02-17 v2 High Energy Physics - Experiment

Abstract

At present, there are several hints of lepton flavor non-universality. The LHCb Collaboration has measured RKB(B+K+μ+μ)/B(B+K+e+e)R_K\equiv{\cal B}(B^+ \to K^+ \mu^+ \mu^-)/{\cal B}(B^+ \to K^+ e^+ e^-), and the BaBar Collaboration has measured R(D())B(BˉD()+τνˉτ)/B(BˉD()+νˉ)R(D^{(*)}) \equiv {\cal B}({\bar B} \to D^{(*)+} \tau^- {\bar\nu}_\tau) / {\cal B}({\bar B} \to D^{(*)+} \ell^- {\bar\nu}_\ell) (=e,μ\ell = e,\mu). In all cases, the experimental results differ from the standard model predictions by 2-3σ\sigma. Recently, an explanation of the RKR_K puzzle was proposed in which new physics (NP) generates a neutral-current operator involving only third-generation particles. Now, assuming the scale of NP is much larger than the weak scale, this NP operator must be made invariant under the full SU(3)C×SU(2)L×U(1)YSU(3)_C \times SU(2)_L \times U(1)_Y gauge group. In this Letter, we note that, when this is done, a new charged-current operator can appear, and this can explain the R(D())R(D^{(*)}) puzzle. A more precise measurement of the double ratio R(D)/R(D)R(D)/R(D^*) can rule out this model.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1412.7164,
  title  = {Simultaneous Explanation of the $R_K$ and $R(D^{(*)})$ Puzzles},
  author = {Bhubanjyoti Bhattacharya and Alakabha Datta and David London and Shanmuka Shivashankara},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.7164},
  year   = {2015}
}

Comments

11 pages, text and citations added, version published in Phys. Lett. B