English

Explaining the $R_K$ and $R_{K^*}$ anomalies

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology 2017-10-25 v4 High Energy Physics - Experiment

Abstract

Recent LHCb results on RKR_{K^*}, the ratio of the branching fractions of BKμ+μB \to K^* \mu^+ \mu^- to that of BKe+eB \to K^* e^+ e^-, for the dilepton invariant mass bins q2m2=[0.0451.1]q^2 \equiv m_{\ell\ell}^2 = [0.045 - 1.1] GeV2^2 and [1.16][1.1 - 6] GeV2^2 show approximately 2.5σ2.5 \sigma deviations from the corresponding Standard Model prediction in each of the bins. This, when combined with the measurement of RK(q2=[16]GeV2)R_K \, (q^2=[1-6]\, \rm GeV^2), a similar ratio for the decay to a pseudo scalar meson, highly suggests for lepton non-universal new physics in semi-leptonic BB meson decays. In this work, we perform a model independent analysis of these potential new physics signals and identify the operators that do the best job in satisfying all these measurements. We show that heavy new physics, giving rise to q2q^2 independent local 4-Fermi operators of scalar, pseudo-scalar, vector or axial-vector type, is unable to explain all the three measurements simultaneously, in particular RKR_{K^*} in the bin [0.045 - 1.1], within their experimental 1σ1\sigma regions. We point out the possibility to explain RKR_{K^*} in the low bin by an additional light (20MeV\lesssim 20 \, \rm MeV) vector boson with appropriate coupling strengths to (bˉs\bar b \, s) and (eˉe\bar e \, e).

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1704.06240,
  title  = {Explaining the $R_K$ and $R_{K^*}$ anomalies},
  author = {Diptimoy Ghosh},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.06240},
  year   = {2017}
}

Comments

Few clarifying comments added. Version to appear in EPJC

R2 v1 2026-06-22T19:22:55.775Z