English

Quantum generalizations of the polynomial hierarchy with applications to QMA(2)

Computational Complexity 2023-12-29 v2 Quantum Physics

Abstract

The polynomial-time hierarchy (PH\mathrm{PH}) has proven to be a powerful tool for providing separations in computational complexity theory (modulo standard conjectures such as PH\mathrm{PH} does not collapse). Here, we study whether two quantum generalizations of PH\mathrm{PH} can similarly prove separations in the quantum setting. The first generalization, QCPH\mathrm{QCPH}, uses classical proofs, and the second, QPH\mathrm{QPH}, uses quantum proofs. For the former, we show quantum variants of the Karp-Lipton theorem and Toda's theorem. For the latter, we place its third level, QΣ3\mathrm{Q} \Sigma_3, into NEXP\mathrm{NEXP} {using the Ellipsoid Method for efficiently solving semidefinite programs}. These results yield two implications for QMA(2)\mathrm{QMA}(2), the variant of Quantum Merlin-Arthur (QMA\mathrm{QMA}) with two unentangled proofs, a complexity class whose characterization has proven difficult. First, if QCPH=QPH\mathrm{QCPH} = \mathrm{QPH} (i.e., alternating quantifiers are sufficiently powerful so as to make classical and quantum proofs "equivalent"), then QMA(2)\mathrm{QMA}(2) is in the Counting Hierarchy (specifically, in PPPPP\mathrm{P}^{\mathrm{PP}^{\mathrm{PP}}}). Second, unless QMA(2)=QΣ3\mathrm{QMA}(2)={\mathrm{Q} \Sigma_3} (i.e., alternating quantifiers do not help in the presence of "unentanglement"), QMA(2)\mathrm{QMA}(2) is strictly contained in NEXP\mathrm{NEXP}.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1805.11139,
  title  = {Quantum generalizations of the polynomial hierarchy with applications to QMA(2)},
  author = {Sevag Gharibian and Miklos Santha and Jamie Sikora and Aarthi Sundaram and Justin Yirka},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.11139},
  year   = {2023}
}

Comments

v2 adds some observations on connections between Quantum Refereed Games and $\mathrm{Q}\Sigma_2$