On ground model definability
Abstract
Laver, and Woodin independently, showed that models of are uniformly definable in their set-forcing extensions, using a ground model parameter. We investigate ground model definability for models of fragments of , particularly of and of , and we obtain both positive and negative results. Generalizing the results of Laver and Woodin, we show that models of are uniformly definable in their set-forcing extensions by posets admitting a gap at , using a ground model parameter. In particular, this means that models of are uniformly definable in their forcing extensions by posets of size less than . We also show that it is consistent for ground model definability to fail for models of of the form . Using forcing, we produce a universe in which there is a cardinal such that is not definable in its Cohen forcing extension. As a corollary, we show that there is always a countable transitive model of violating ground model definability. These results turn out to have a bearing on ground model definability for models of . It follows from our proof methods that the hereditary size of the parameter that Woodin used to define a model in its set-forcing extension is best possible.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.1311.6789,
title = {On ground model definability},
author = {Victoria Gitman and Thomas A. Johnstone},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1311.6789},
year = {2013}
}
Comments
17 pages. Discussion and commentary concerning this article can be made at http://boolesrings.org/victoriagitman/2013/06/25/on-ground-model-definability/