English

New results on the least common multiple of consecutive integers

Number Theory 2008-08-12 v1

Abstract

When studying the least common multiple of some finite sequences of integers, the first author introduced the interesting arithmetic functions gkg_k (kN)(k \in \mathbb{N}), defined by gk(n):=n(n+1)...(n+k)\lcm(n,n+1,>...,n+k)g_k(n) := \frac{n (n + 1) ... (n + k)}{\lcm(n, n + 1, >..., n + k)} (nN{0})(\forall n \in \mathbb{N} \setminus \{0\}). He proved that gkg_k (kN)(k \in \mathbb{N}) is periodic and k!k! is a period of gkg_k. He raised the open problem consisting to determine the smallest positive period PkP_k of gkg_k. Very recently, S. Hong and Y. Yang have improved the period k!k! of gkg_k to \lcm(1,2,...,k)\lcm(1, 2, ..., k). In addition, they have conjectured that PkP_k is always a multiple of the positive integer \lcm(1,2,>...,k,k+1)k+1\frac{\lcm(1, 2, >..., k, k + 1)}{k + 1}. An immediate consequence of this conjecture states that if (k+1)(k + 1) is prime then the exact period of gkg_k is precisely equal to \lcm(1,2,...,k)\lcm(1, 2, ..., k). In this paper, we first prove the conjecture of S. Hong and Y. Yang and then we give the exact value of PkP_k (kN)(k \in \mathbb{N}). We deduce, as a corollary, that PkP_k is equal to the part of \lcm(1,2,...,k)\lcm(1, 2, ..., k) not divisible by some prime.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.0808.1507,
  title  = {New results on the least common multiple of consecutive integers},
  author = {Bakir Farhi and Daniel Kane},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:0808.1507},
  year   = {2008}
}

Comments

8 pages, to appear

R2 v1 2026-06-21T11:09:21.878Z