Is addition definable from multiplication and successor?
Abstract
A map between (associative, unital, but not necessarily commutative) rings is a\emph{brachymorphism} if and whenever . We tackle the problem whether every brachymorphism is additive (i.e., ), showing that in many contexts, including the following, the answer is positive: is finite (or, more generally, is left or right Artinian); is any ring of matrices over a commutative ring; is Engelian; every element of is a sum of -regular and central elements (this applies to -regular rings, Banach algebras, and power series rings); is the full matrix ring of order greater than over any ring; is the monoid ring for a commutative ring and a -regular monoid ; is the Weyl algebra over a commutative ring with positive characteristic; is the power function over any ring; is the determinant function over any ring of matrices, with , over a commutative ring, such that if then contains scalar matrices with non zero divisor differences.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2405.08364,
title = {Is addition definable from multiplication and successor?},
author = {Friedrich Wehrung},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.08364},
year = {2024}
}