English

Functional Continuous Uncertainty Principle

Functional Analysis 2023-09-03 v1

Abstract

Let (Ω,μ)(\Omega, \mu), (Δ,ν)(\Delta, \nu) be measure spaces. Let ({fα}αΩ,{τα}αΩ)(\{f_\alpha\}_{\alpha\in \Omega}, \{\tau_\alpha\}_{\alpha\in \Omega}) and ({gβ}βΔ,{ωβ}βΔ)(\{g_\beta\}_{\beta\in \Delta}, \{\omega_\beta\}_{\beta\in \Delta}) be continuous p-Schauder frames for a Banach space X\mathcal{X}. Then for every xX{0}x \in \mathcal{X}\setminus\{0\}, we show that \begin{align} (1) \quad \quad \quad \quad \mu(\operatorname{supp}(\theta_f x))^\frac{1}{p} \nu(\operatorname{supp}(\theta_g x))^\frac{1}{q} \geq \frac{1}{\displaystyle\sup_{\alpha \in \Omega, \beta \in \Delta}|f_\alpha(\omega_\beta)|}, \quad \nu(\operatorname{supp}(\theta_g x))^\frac{1}{p} \mu(\operatorname{supp}(\theta_f x))^\frac{1}{q}\geq \frac{1}{\displaystyle\sup_{\alpha \in \Omega , \beta \in \Delta}|g_\beta(\tau_\alpha)|}. \end{align} where \begin{align*} &\theta_f: \mathcal{X} \ni x \mapsto \theta_fx \in \mathcal{L}^p(\Omega, \mu); \quad \theta_fx: \Omega \ni \alpha \mapsto (\theta_fx) (\alpha):= f_\alpha (x) \in \mathbb{K}, &\theta_g: \mathcal{X} \ni x \mapsto \theta_gx \in \mathcal{L}^p(\Delta, \nu); \quad \theta_gx: \Delta \ni \beta \mapsto (\theta_gx) (\beta):= g_\beta (x) \in \mathbb{K} \end{align*} and qq is the conjugate index of pp. We call Inequality (1) as \textbf{Functional Continuous Uncertainty Principle}. It improves the Functional Donoho-Stark-Elad-Bruckstein-Ricaud-Torr\'{e}sani Uncertainty Principle obtained by K. Mahesh Krishna in [arXiv:2304.03324v1 [math.FA], 5 April 2023]. It also answers a question asked by Prof. Philip B. Stark to the author. Based on Donoho-Elad Sparsity Theorem, we formulate Measure Minimization Conjecture.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2308.00312,
  title  = {Functional Continuous Uncertainty Principle},
  author = {K. Mahesh Krishna},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.00312},
  year   = {2023}
}

Comments

7 Pages, 0 Figures

R2 v1 2026-06-28T11:45:13.864Z