English

Dispu$\tau$able: the high cost of a low optical depth

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics 2026-02-25 v2

Abstract

Recent baryonic acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) are mildly discrepant (2.2σ2.2\sigma) with the cosmic microwave background (CMB) when interpreted within Λ\LambdaCDM. When analyzing these data with extended cosmologies this inconsistency manifests as a 3σ\simeq3\sigma preference for sub-minimal neutrino mass or evolving dark energy. It is known that the preference for sub-minimal neutrino mass from the suppression of structure growth could be alleviated by increasing the optical depth to reionization τ\tau. We show that, because the CMB-inferred τ\tau is negatively correlated with the matter fraction, a larger optical depth resolves a similar preference from geometric constraints. Optical depths large enough to resolve the neutrino mass tension (τ0.09)\tau\sim0.09) reduce the preference for evolving dark energy from 3σ\simeq3\sigma to 1.5σ\simeq1.5\sigma and increase the CMB-inferred values of nsn_s and H0H_0 to 0.968±0.0040.968\pm0.004 and 67.94±0.4467.94\pm0.44 km/s/Mpc, respectively. Conversely, within Λ\LambdaCDM the combination of DESI BAO, high-\ell CMB and CMB lensing yields τ=0.090±0.012\tau = 0.090 \pm 0.012, which is in 35σ\simeq3-5\sigma tension with Planck low-\ell polarization data when taken at face value. Essentially all current CMB analyses - including recent results from WMAP+ACT and SPT - adopt the Planck measurement of τ\tau: thus a systematic in large-scale Planck polarization would serve as a "single-point failure" for most modern cosmological analyses that include CMB data. While there is no evidence for systematics in the large-scale Planck data, τ\tau remains the least well-constrained Λ\LambdaCDM parameter and is far from its cosmic variance limit. This strengthens the case for future large-scale CMB experiments as well as direct probes of the epoch of reionization.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2504.16932,
  title  = {Dispu$\tau$able: the high cost of a low optical depth},
  author = {Noah Sailer and Gerrit S. Farren and Simone Ferraro and Martin White},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.16932},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

4 pages, 4 figures, comments welcome! v2: matches published PRL version (title differs)