English

Eliminating the optical depth nuisance from the CMB with 21 cm cosmology

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics 2016-02-23 v2

Abstract

Amongst standard model parameters that are constrained by cosmic microwave background (CMB) observations, the optical depth τ\tau stands out as a nuisance parameter. While τ\tau provides some crude limits on reionization, it also degrades constraints on other cosmological parameters. Here we explore how 21 cm cosmology---as a direct probe of reionization---can be used to independently predict τ\tau in an effort to improve CMB parameter constraints. We develop two complementary schemes for doing so. The first uses 21 cm power spectrum observations in conjunction with semi-analytic simulations to predict τ\tau. The other uses global 21 cm measurements to directly constrain low redshift (post-reheating) contributions to τ\tau in a relatively model-independent way. Forecasting the performance of the upcoming Hydrogen Epoch of Reionization Array, we find that significant reductions in the errors on τ\tau can be achieved. These results are particularly effective at breaking the CMB degeneracy between τ\tau and the amplitude of the primordial fluctuation spectrum AsA_s, with errors on ln(1010As)\ln (10^{10} A_s) reduced by up to a factor of four. Stage 4 CMB constraints on the neutrino mass sum are also improved, with errors potentially reduced to 12meV12\,\textrm{meV} regardless of whether CMB experiments can precisely measure the reionization bump in polarization power spectra. Observations of the 21 cm line are therefore capable of improving not only our understanding of reionization astrophysics, but also of cosmology in general.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1509.08463,
  title  = {Eliminating the optical depth nuisance from the CMB with 21 cm cosmology},
  author = {Adrian Liu and Jonathan R. Pritchard and Rupert Allison and Aaron R. Parsons and Uroš Seljak and Blake D. Sherwin},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.08463},
  year   = {2016}
}

Comments

23 pages, 11 figures; Replaced to match accepted PRD version. New version contains small editorial changes throughout, and an additional section (Section VI) to discuss model dependence. Additional caveats and assumptions are highlighted, but final results are unchanged