Dark Energy Survey: implications for cosmological expansion models from the final DES Baryon Acoustic Oscillation and Supernova data
Abstract
The Dark Energy Survey (DES) recently released the final results of its two principal probes of the expansion history: Type Ia Supernovae (SNe) and Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations (BAO). We explore the cosmological implications of these data in combination with external Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN), and age-of-the-Universe information. The BAO measurement, away from Planck's CDM predictions, pushes for low values of compared to Planck, in contrast to SN which prefers a higher value. We identify several tensions among datasets in the CDM model that cannot be resolved by including either curvature or a constant dark energy equation of state. By combining BAO+SN+CMB despite these mild tensions, we obtain = in CDM, and in CDM. In CDM, BAO and SN push again in different directions of parameter space, favoring, respectively and . If we open the parameter space to CDM, all the datasets are mutually more compatible, and we find concordance in the quadrant, with BAO pushing for and SN for . For DES BAO and SN in combination with Planck-CMB, we find a deviation from CDM, with , , a Hubble constant of km sMpc, and an abundance of matter of . For the combination of all the background cosmological probes considered we still find a deviation of from CDM in the plane. Assuming a minimal neutrino mass, this work provides tentative evidence for non-CDM physics, which is consistent with recent claims in support of evolving dark energy, or a source of unknown systematics.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2503.06712,
title = {Dark Energy Survey: implications for cosmological expansion models from the final DES Baryon Acoustic Oscillation and Supernova data},
author = {DES Collaboration and T. M. C. Abbott and M. Acevedo and M. Adamow and M. Aguena and A. Alarcon and S. Allam and O. Alves and F. Andrade-Oliveira and J. Annis and P. Armstrong and S. Avila and D. Bacon and K. Bechtol and J. Blazek and S. Bocquet and D. Brooks and D. Brout and D. L. Burke and H. Camacho and R. Camilleri and G. Campailla and A. Carnero Rosell and A. Carr and J. Carretero and F. J. Castander and R. Cawthon and K. C. Chan and C. Chang and R. Chen and C. Conselice and M. Costanzi and M. Crocce and L. N. da Costa and M. E. S. Pereira and T. M. Davis and J. De Vicente and N. Deiosso and S. Desai and H. T. Diehl and S. Dodelson and C. Doux and A. Drlica-Wagner and J. Elvin-Poole and S. Everett and I. Ferrero and A. Ferté and B. Flaugher and J. Frieman and L. Galbany and J. García-Bellido and M. Gatti and E. Gaztanaga and G. Giannini and D. Gruen and R. A. Gruendl and G. Gutierrez and W. G. Hartley and K. Herner and S. R. Hinton and D. L. Hollowood and K. Honscheid and D. Huterer and D. J. James and N. Jeffrey and T. Jeltema and R. Kessler and O. Lahav and J. Lee and S. Lee and C. Lidman and H. Lin and M. Lin and J. L. Marshall and J. Mena-Fernández and R. Miquel and J. Muir and A. Möller and R. C. Nichol and A. Palmese and M. Paterno and W. J. Percival and A. Pieres and A. A. Plazas Malagón and B. Popovic and A. Porredon and J. Prat and H. Qu and M. Raveri and M. Rodriguez-Monroy and A. K. Romer and E. S. Rykoff and M. Sako and S. Samuroff and E. Sanchez and D. Sanchez Cid and D. Scolnic and I. Sevilla-Noarbe and P. Shah and E. Sheldon and M. Smith and E. Suchyta and M. Sullivan and M. E. C. Swanson and B. O. Sánchez and G. Tarle and G. Taylor and D. Thomas and C. To and L. Toribio San Cipriano and M. Toy and M. A. Troxel and D. L. Tucker and V. Vikram and M. Vincenzi and A. R. Walker and N. Weaverdyck and J. Weller and P. Wiseman and M. Yamamoto and B. Yanny},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.06712},
year = {2026}
}
Comments
Accepted in PRD