English

Discrepancy of Sums of two Arithmetic Progressions

Number Theory 2007-05-23 v1

Abstract

Estimating the discrepancy of the hypergraph of all arithmetic progressions in the set [N]={1,2,\hdots,N}[N]=\{1,2,\hdots,N\} was one of the famous open problems in combinatorial discrepancy theory for a long time. An extension of this classical hypergraph is the hypergraph of sums of kk (k1k\geq 1 fixed) arithmetic progressions. The hyperedges of this hypergraph are of the form A1+A2+\hdots+AkA_{1}+A_{2}+\hdots+A_{k} in [N][N], where the AiA_{i} are arithmetic progressions. For this hypergraph Hebbinghaus (2004) proved a lower bound of Ω(Nk/(2k+2))\Omega(N^{k/(2k+2)}). Note that the probabilistic method gives an upper bound of order O((NlogN)1/2)O((N\log N)^{1/2}) for all fixed kk. P\v{r}\'{i}v\v{e}tiv\'{y} improved the lower bound for all k3k\geq 3 to Ω(N1/2)\Omega(N^{1/2}) in 2005. Thus, the case k=2k=2 (hypergraph of sums of two arithmetic progressions) remained the only case with a large gap between the known upper and lower bound. We bridge his gap (up to a logarithmic factor) by proving a lower bound of order Ω(N1/2)\Omega(N^{1/2}) for the discrepancy of the hypergraph of sums of two arithmetic progressions.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.math/0703108,
  title  = {Discrepancy of Sums of two Arithmetic Progressions},
  author = {Nils Hebbinghaus},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:math/0703108},
  year   = {2007}
}

Comments

15 pages, 0 figures

R2 v1 2026-07-22T17:52:09.890Z