English

Better Balance by Being Biased: A 0.8776-Approximation for Max Bisection

Data Structures and Algorithms 2012-07-09 v2

Abstract

Recently Raghavendra and Tan (SODA 2012) gave a 0.85-approximation algorithm for the Max Bisection problem. We improve their algorithm to a 0.8776-approximation. As Max Bisection is hard to approximate within αGW+ϵ0.8786\alpha_{GW} + \epsilon \approx 0.8786 under the Unique Games Conjecture (UGC), our algorithm is nearly optimal. We conjecture that Max Bisection is approximable within αGWϵ\alpha_{GW}-\epsilon, i.e., the bisection constraint (essentially) does not make Max Cut harder. We also obtain an optimal algorithm (assuming the UGC) for the analogous variant of Max 2-Sat. Our approximation ratio for this problem exactly matches the optimal approximation ratio for Max 2-Sat, i.e., αLLZ+ϵ0.9401\alpha_{LLZ} + \epsilon \approx 0.9401, showing that the bisection constraint does not make Max 2-Sat harder. This improves on a 0.93-approximation for this problem due to Raghavendra and Tan.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1205.0458,
  title  = {Better Balance by Being Biased: A 0.8776-Approximation for Max Bisection},
  author = {Per Austrin and Siavosh Benabbas and Konstantinos Georgiou},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1205.0458},
  year   = {2012}
}
R2 v1 2026-06-21T20:57:42.841Z