A Family of Well-Covered Graphs with Unimodal Independence Polynomials
Abstract
If for any the -th coefficient of a polynomial I(G;x) is equal to the number of stable sets of cardinality in graph , then it is called the independence polynomial of (Gutman and Harary, 1983). J. I. Brown, K. Dilcher and R. J. Nowakowski (2000) conjectured that the independence polynomial of a well-covered graph (i.e., a graph whose all maximal independent sets are of the same size) is unimodal, that is, there exists an index such that the part of the sequence of coefficients from the first to -th is non-decreasing while the other part of coefficients is non-increasing. T. S. Michael and N. Traves (2002) provided examples of well-covered graphs whose independence polynomials are not unimodal. A. Finbow, B. Hartnell and R. J. Nowakowski (1993) proved that under certain conditions, any well-covered graph equals G* for some , where G* is the graph obtained from by appending a single pendant edge to each vertex of . Y. Alavi, P. J. Malde, A. J. Schwenk and P. Erd\"{o}s (1987) asked whether for trees the independence polynomial is unimodal. V. E. Levit and E. Mandrescu (2002) validated the unimodality of the independence polynomials of some well-covered trees (e.g., , where is the path on vertices and is the -star graph). In this paper we show that for any graph with the stability number alpha(G) < 5, the independence polynomial of G* is unimodal.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.math/0307012,
title = {A Family of Well-Covered Graphs with Unimodal Independence Polynomials},
author = {Vadim E. Levit and Eugen Mandrescu},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:math/0307012},
year = {2007}
}
Comments
This paper has been presented at Thirty-fourth Southeastern International Conference on Combinatorics, Graph Theory, and Computing, March 2003, Florida Atlantic University, USA; 13 pages; 2 figures