A bridge between Dubovitskii - Federer theorems and the coarea formula
Abstract
The Morse-Sard theorem requires that a mapping is of class , . In 1957 Dubovitski\u{\i} generalized this result by proving that almost all level sets for a mapping have -negligible intersection with its critical set, where . Here the critical set, or -critical set is defined as . Another generalization was obtained independently by Dubovitski\u{\i} and Federer in 1966, namely for mappings and integers they proved that the set of -critical values is -negligible for . They also established the sharpness of these results within the category. Here we prove that Dubovitski\u{\i}'s theorem can be generalized to the case of continuous mappings of the Sobolev-Lorentz class , (this is the minimal integrability assumption that guarantees the continuity of mappings). In this situation the mappings need not be everywhere differentiable and in order to handle the set of nondifferentiability points, we establish for such mappings an analog of the Luzin -property with respect to lower dimensional Hausdorff content. Finally, we formulate and prove a~ that includes all the above results as particular cases. This result is new also for smooth mappings but is presented here in the general Sobolev context. The proofs of the results are based on our previous joint papers with J.~Bourgain (2013, 2015). Note, that in this paper some result concerning the Coarea formula was not formulated accurately. Now we put an Addendum consisting of three parts: first, we describe the accurate formulation of this result, then we give some historical remarks, and finally its relation to other results of the paper.
Cite
@article{arxiv.1603.05858,
title = {A bridge between Dubovitskii - Federer theorems and the coarea formula},
author = {Piotr Hajlasz and Mikhail V. Korobkov and Jan Kristensen},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.05858},
year = {2019}
}
Comments
In this paper some result concerning the Coarea formula was not formulated accurately. Now we put an Addendum consisting of three parts: first, we describe the accurate formulation of this result, then we give some historical remarks, and finally its relation to other results of the paper