English

The Special Tree Number

Logic 2023-01-10 v3

Abstract

Define the special tree number, denoted st\mathfrak{st}, to be the least size of a tree of height ω1\omega_1 which is neither special nor has a cofinal branch. This cardinal had previously been studied in the context of fragments of MA\mathsf{MA} but in this paper we look at its relation to other, more typical, cardinal characteristics. Classical facts imply that 1st20\aleph_1 \leq \mathfrak{st} \leq 2^{\aleph_0}, under Martin's Axiom st=20\mathfrak{st} = 2^{\aleph_0} and that st=1\mathfrak{st} = \aleph_1 is consistent with MA(Knaster)+20=κ\mathsf{MA}({\rm Knaster}) + 2^{\aleph_0} = \kappa for any regular κ\kappa thus the value of st\mathfrak{st} is not decided by ZFC\mathsf{ZFC} and in fact can be strictly below essentially all well studied cardinal characteristics. We show that conversely it is consistent that st=20=κ\mathfrak{st} = 2^{\aleph_0} = \kappa for any κ\kappa of uncountable cofinality while non(M)=a=s=g=1{\rm non}(\mathcal M) = \mathfrak{a} = \mathfrak{s} = \mathfrak{g} = \aleph_1. In particular st\mathfrak{st} is independent of the lefthand side of Cicho\'{n}'s diagram, amongst other things. The proof involves an in depth study of the standard ccc forcing notion to specialize (wide) Aronszajn trees, which may be of independent interest.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2203.04186,
  title  = {The Special Tree Number},
  author = {Corey Bacal Switzer},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.04186},
  year   = {2023}
}

Comments

21 pages, 1 figure, now accepted at Fundamenta Mathematicae. Third draft includes some minor fixes as well as a discussion of a theorem of Laver which is relevant to the paper

R2 v1 2026-06-24T10:06:12.976Z