English

Sinks and sources for C1 dynamics whose Lyapunov exponents have constant sign

Dynamical Systems 2021-07-27 v3 Classical Analysis and ODEs

Abstract

Let f:MMf:M\to M be a C1C^1 map of a compact manifold MM, with dimension at least 22, admitting some point whose future trajectory has only negative Lyapunov exponents. Then this trajectory converges to a periodic sink. We need only assume that DfDf is never the null map at any point (in particular, we need no extra smoothness assumption on DfDf), encompassing a wide class of possible critical behavior. Similarly, a trajectory having only positive Lyapunov exponents for a C1C^1 diffeomorphism is itself a periodic repeller (source). Analogously for a C1C^1 open and dense subset of vector field on finite dimensional manifolds: for a flow ϕt\phi_t generated by such a vector field, if a trajectory admits weak asymptotic sectional contraction (the extreme rates of expansion of the Linear Poincar\'e Flow are all negative), then this trajectory belongs either to the basin of attraction of a periodic hyperbolic attracting orbit (a periodic sink or an attracting equilibrium); or the trajectory accumulates a codimension one saddle singularity. Similar results hold for weak sectional expanding trajectories. Both results extend part of the non-uniform hyperbolic theory (Pesin's Theory) from the C1+C^{1+} diffeomorphism setting to C1C^1 endomorphisms and C1C^1 flows. Some ergodic theoretical consequences are discussed. The proofs use versions of Pliss' Lemma for maps and flows translated as (reverse) hyperbolic times, and a result ensuring that certain subadditive cocycles over vector fields are in fact additive.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1806.05245,
  title  = {Sinks and sources for C1 dynamics whose Lyapunov exponents have constant sign},
  author = {Vitor Araujo},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.05245},
  year   = {2021}
}

Comments

37 pages; 10 figures; presentation improved after referee's report and correction of imprecise statements of lemmas 3.3, 3.4 and 3.5, and small adjustements in the proofs. To appear in Osaka J Math 2020

R2 v1 2026-06-23T02:29:14.646Z