English

Relating $2$-Rainbow Domination to Roman domination

Combinatorics 2015-12-04 v1

Abstract

For a graph GG, let γR(G)\gamma_R(G) and γr2(G)\gamma_{r2}(G) denote the Roman domination number of GG and the 22-rainbow domination number of GG, respectively. It is known that γr2(G)γR(G)32γr2(G)\gamma_{r2}(G)\leq \gamma_R(G)\leq \frac{3}{2}\gamma_{r2}(G). Fujita and Furuya (Difference between 2-rainbow domination and Roman domination in graphs, Discrete Applied Mathematics 161 (2013) 806-812) present some kind of characterization of the graphs GG for which γR(G)γr2(G)=k\gamma_R(G)-\gamma_{r2}(G)=k for some integer kk. Unfortunately, their result does not lead to an algorithm that allows to recognize these graphs efficiently. We show that for every fixed non-negative integer kk, the recognition of the connected K4K_4-free graphs GG with γR(G)γr2(G)=k\gamma_R(G)-\gamma_{r2}(G)=k is NP-hard, which implies that there is most likely no good characterization of these graphs. We characterize the graphs GG such that γr2(H)=γR(H)\gamma_{r2}(H)=\gamma_R(H) for every induced subgraph HH of GG, and collect several properties of the graphs GG with γR(G)=32γr2(G)\gamma_R(G)=\frac{3}{2}\gamma_{r2}(G).

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1512.01067,
  title  = {Relating $2$-Rainbow Domination to Roman domination},
  author = {José D. Alvarado and Simone Dantas and Dieter Rautenbach},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.01067},
  year   = {2015}
}
R2 v1 2026-06-22T12:00:33.554Z