English

Quasiconformal maps, analytic capacity, and non linear potentials

Classical Analysis and ODEs 2019-12-19 v2 Complex Variables

Abstract

In this paper we prove that if ϕ:\C\C\phi:\C\to\C is a KK-quasiconformal map, with K>1K>1, and E\CE\subset \C is a compact set contained in a ball BB, then C˙2K2K+1,2K+1K+1(E)\diam(B)2K+1c1(γ(ϕ(E))\diam(ϕ(B)))2KK+1,\frac{\dot C_{\frac{2K}{2K+1},\frac{2K+1}{K+1}}(E)}{\diam(B)^{\frac2{K+1}}} \geq c^{-1} (\frac{\gamma(\phi(E))}{\diam(\phi(B))})^{\frac{2K}{K+1}}, where γ\gamma stands for the analytic capacity and C˙2K2K+1,2K+1K+1\dot C_{\frac{2K}{2K+1},\frac{2K+1}{K+1}} is a capacity associated to a non linear Riesz potential. As a consequence, if EE is not KK-removable (i.e. removable for bounded KK-quasiregular maps), it has positive capacity C˙frac2K2K+1,2K+1K+1\dot C_{frac{2K}{2K+1},\frac{2K+1}{K+1}}. This improves previous results that assert that EE must have non σ\sigma-finite Hausdorff measure of dimension 2/(K+1)2/(K+1). We also show that the indices 2K2K+1\frac{2K}{2K+1}, 2K+1K+1\frac{2K+1}{K+1} are sharp, and that Hausdorff gauge functions do not appropriately discriminate which sets are KK-removable. So essentially we solve the problem of finding sharp "metric" conditions for KK-removability.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.0907.4188,
  title  = {Quasiconformal maps, analytic capacity, and non linear potentials},
  author = {Xavier Tolsa and Ignacio Uriarte-Tuero},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:0907.4188},
  year   = {2019}
}

Comments

57 pages; typos corrected

R2 v1 2026-06-21T13:28:28.718Z