Approximate orthogonality, Bourgain's pinned distance theorem and exponential frames
Abstract
Let be a countable and discrete subset of , , of positive upper Beurling density. Let denote a bounded symmetric convex set with a smooth boundary and everywhere non-vanishing Gaussian curvature. It is known that cannot serve as an orthogonal basis for \cite{IKT01}. In this paper, we prove that even approximate average orthogonality is an obstacle to the existence of an exponential frame in the following sense. Let be as above and be a continuous monotonically nonincreasing function on such that the approximate orthogonality condition holds \begin{align}\notag {\left( \frac{1}{2^j} \int_{2^j}^{2^{j+1}} \phi^p(t) dt \right)}^{1/p} \leq c_j 2^{-j\frac{d+1}{2}} \quad \text{and} \quad |\widehat{\chi}_K(a-a')| \leq \phi(\rho^*(a-a')) \ \forall a \not=a , a,a' \in A, \end{align} where is the Minkowski functional on , the dual body of . Then, if then the upper density of is equal to , hence is not a frame for . The case was previously established by the authors of this paper in \cite{IM2020}. The point is that if is a frame for , then very few pairs of distinct exponentials from come anywhere near being orthogonal. Our proof uses a generalization of Bourgain's result on pinned distances determined by sets of positive Lebesgue upper density in , . We also improve the version of this result originally established in \cite{IM2020}. By using an extension of the combinatorial idea from \cite{IR03}, we prove that under the hypothesis, is finite if . If mod may be infinite, but if it is, then it must be a subset of a line.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2301.09144,
title = {Approximate orthogonality, Bourgain's pinned distance theorem and exponential frames},
author = {Alex Iosevich and Azita Mayeli},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.09144},
year = {2023}
}