English

Approximate orthogonality, Bourgain's pinned distance theorem and exponential frames

Classical Analysis and ODEs 2023-01-24 v1

Abstract

Let AA be a countable and discrete subset of Rd{\Bbb R}^d, d2d \ge 2, of positive upper Beurling density. Let KK denote a bounded symmetric convex set with a smooth boundary and everywhere non-vanishing Gaussian curvature. It is known that E(A)={e2πixa}aA{\mathcal E}(A)=\{e^{2 \pi i x \cdot a}\}_{a \in A} cannot serve as an orthogonal basis for L2(K)L^2(K) \cite{IKT01}. In this paper, we prove that even approximate average orthogonality is an obstacle to the existence of an exponential frame in the following sense. Let AA be as above and ϕ0\phi \ge 0 be a continuous monotonically nonincreasing function on [0,)[0, \infty) such that the approximate orthogonality condition holds \begin{align}\notag {\left( \frac{1}{2^j} \int_{2^j}^{2^{j+1}} \phi^p(t) dt \right)}^{1/p} \leq c_j 2^{-j\frac{d+1}{2}} \quad \text{and} \quad |\widehat{\chi}_K(a-a')| \leq \phi(\rho^*(a-a')) \ \forall a \not=a , a,a' \in A, \end{align} where ρ\rho^* is the Minkowski functional on KK^*, the dual body of KK. Then, if lim supjcj=0,\limsup_{j \to \infty} c_j=0, then the upper density of AA is equal to 00, hence E(A){\mathcal E}(A) is not a frame for L2(K)L^2(K). The case p=p=\infty was previously established by the authors of this paper in \cite{IM2020}. The point is that if E(A){\mathcal E}(A) is a frame for L2(K)L^2(K), then very few pairs of distinct exponentials e2πix.a,e2πix.ae^{2 \pi i x.a}, e^{2 \pi i x.a'} from E(A){\mathcal E}(A) come anywhere near being orthogonal. Our proof uses a generalization of Bourgain's result on pinned distances determined by sets of positive Lebesgue upper density in Rd{\Bbb R}^d, d2d \ge 2. We also improve the LL^{\infty} version of this result originally established in \cite{IM2020}. By using an extension of the combinatorial idea from \cite{IR03}, we prove that under the LL^{\infty} hypothesis, AA is finite if d1mod4d \not=1 \mod 4. If d=1d=1 mod 4,A4, A may be infinite, but if it is, then it must be a subset of a line.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2301.09144,
  title  = {Approximate orthogonality, Bourgain's pinned distance theorem and exponential frames},
  author = {Alex Iosevich and Azita Mayeli},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.09144},
  year   = {2023}
}
R2 v1 2026-06-28T08:17:20.537Z