English

On product sets of arithmetic progressions

Number Theory 2023-07-26 v4 Combinatorics

Abstract

We prove that the size of the product set of any finite arithmetic progression AZ\mathcal{A}\subset \mathbb{Z} satisfies AAA2(logA)2θ+o(1),|\mathcal A \cdot \mathcal A| \ge \frac{|\mathcal A|^2}{(\log |\mathcal A|)^{2\theta +o(1)} } , where 2θ=1(1+loglog2)/(log2)2\theta=1-(1+\log\log 2)/(\log 2) is the constant appearing in the celebrated Erd\H{o}s multiplication table problem. This confirms a conjecture of Elekes and Ruzsa from about two decades ago. If instead A\mathcal{A} is relaxed to be a subset of a finite arithmetic progression in integers with positive constant density, we prove that AAA2(logA)2log21+o(1).|\mathcal A \cdot \mathcal A | \ge \frac{|\mathcal A|^{2}}{(\log |\mathcal A|)^{2\log 2- 1 + o(1)}}. This solves the typical case of another conjecture of Elekes and Ruzsa on the size of the product set of a set A\mathcal{A} whose sumset is of size O(A)O(|\mathcal{A}|). Our bounds are sharp up to the o(1)o(1) term in the exponents. We further prove asymmetric extensions of the above results.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2201.00104,
  title  = {On product sets of arithmetic progressions},
  author = {Max Wenqiang Xu and Yunkun Zhou},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.00104},
  year   = {2023}
}

Comments

31 pages

R2 v1 2026-06-24T08:37:21.945Z