It could be worse, it could be raining: reliable automatic meteorological forecasting
Abstract
Meteorological forecasting provides reliable prediction about the future weather within a given interval of time. Meteorological forecasting can be viewed as a form of hybrid diagnostic reasoning and can be mapped onto an integrated conceptual framework. The automation of the forecasting process would be helpful in a number of contexts, in particular: when the amount of data is too wide to be dealt with manually; to support forecasters education; when forecasting about underpopulated geographic areas is not interesting for everyday life (and then is out from human forecasters' tasks) but is central for tourism sponsorship. We present logic MeteoLOG, a framework that models the main steps of the reasoner the forecaster adopts to provide a bulletin. MeteoLOG rests on several traditions, mainly on fuzzy, temporal and probabilistic logics. On this basis, we also introduce the algorithm Tournament, that transforms a set of MeteoLOG rules into a defeasible theory, that can be implemented into an automatic reasoner. We finally propose an example that models a real world forecasting scenario.
Cite
@article{arxiv.1901.09867,
title = {It could be worse, it could be raining: reliable automatic meteorological forecasting},
author = {Matteo Cristani and Francesco Domenichini and Claudio Tomazzoli and Luca Viganò and Margherita Zorzi},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.09867},
year = {2019}
}