English

Improved bounds for induced poset saturation

Combinatorics 2019-08-06 v1

Abstract

Given a finite poset P\mathcal{P}, a family F\mathcal{F} of elements in the Boolean lattice is induced-P\mathcal{P}-saturated if F\mathcal{F} contains no copy of P\mathcal{P} as an induced subposet but every proper superset of F\mathcal{F} contains a copy of P\mathcal{P} as an induced subposet. The minimum size of an induced-P\mathcal{P}-saturated family in the nn-dimensional Boolean lattice, denoted sat(n,P)\operatorname{sat}^*(n,\mathcal{P}), was first studied by Ferrara et al. (2017). Our work focuses on strengthening lower bounds. For the 4-point poset known as the diamond, we prove sat(n,D2)n\operatorname{sat}^*(n,\mathcal{D}_2)\geq\sqrt{n}, improving upon a logarithmic lower bound. For the antichain with k+1k+1 elements, we prove sat(n,Ak+1)(1ok(1))knlog2k\operatorname{sat}^*(n,\mathcal{A}_{k+1})\geq (1-o_k(1))\frac{kn}{\log_2 k}, improving upon a lower bound of 3n13n-1 for k3k\geq 3.

Cite

@article{arxiv.1908.01108,
  title  = {Improved bounds for induced poset saturation},
  author = {Ryan R. Martin and Heather C. Smith and Shanise Walker},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.01108},
  year   = {2019}
}
R2 v1 2026-06-23T10:38:45.569Z