English

Existence of Schrodinger Evolution with Absorbing Boundary Condition

Mathematical Physics 2025-09-09 v5 math.MP Quantum Physics

Abstract

Consider a non-relativistic quantum particle with wave function inside a region ΩR3\Omega\subset \mathbb{R}^3, and suppose that detectors are placed along the boundary Ω\partial \Omega. The question how to compute the probability distribution of the time at which the detector surface registers the particle boils down to finding a reasonable mathematical definition of an ideal detecting surface; a particularly convincing definition, called the \emph{absorbing boundary rule}, involves a time evolution for the particle's wave function ψ\psi expressed by a Schr\"odinger equation in Ω\Omega together with an ``absorbing'' boundary condition on Ω\partial \Omega first considered by Werner in 1987, viz., ψ/n=iκψ\partial \psi/\partial n=i\kappa\psi with κ>0\kappa>0 and /n\partial/\partial n the normal derivative. We provide here a discussion of the rigorous mathematical foundation of this rule. First, for the viability of the rule it plays a crucial role that these two equations together uniquely define the time evolution of ψ\psi; we point out here how, under some technical assumptions on the regularity (i.e., smoothness) of the detecting surface, the Lumer-Phillips theorem implies that the time evolution is well defined and given by a contraction semigroup. Second, we show that the collapse required for the NN-particle version of the problem is well defined. We also prove that the joint distribution of the detection times and places, according to the absorbing boundary rule, is governed by a positive-operator-valued measure.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1912.12057,
  title  = {Existence of Schrodinger Evolution with Absorbing Boundary Condition},
  author = {Lawrence Frolov and Stefan Teufel and Roderich Tumulka},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.12057},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

21 pages LaTeX, no figures; v5 minor revision; in v4, an error in Theorem 1 has been corrected, and the treatment of the Dirac case postponed to a future paper

R2 v1 2026-06-23T12:57:11.859Z