English

Absorbing Boundary Condition as Limiting Case of Imaginary Potentials

Quantum Physics 2023-09-20 v1

Abstract

Imaginary potentials such as V(x)=iv1Ω(x)V(x)=-iv 1_\Omega(x) (with v>0v>0 a constant, Ω\Omega a subset of 3-space, and 1Ω1_\Omega its characteristic function) have been used in quantum mechanics as models of a detector. They represent the effect of a "soft" detector that takes a while to notice a particle in the detector volume Ω\Omega. In order to model a "hard" detector (i.e., one that registers a particle as soon as it enters Ω\Omega), one may think of taking the limit vv\to\infty of increasing detector strength vv. However, as pointed out by Allcock, in this limit the particle never enters Ω\Omega; its wave function gets reflected at the boundary Ω\partial \Omega of Ω\Omega in the same way as by a Dirichlet boundary condition on Ω\partial \Omega. This phenomenon, a cousin of the "quantum Zeno effect," might suggest that a hard detector is mathematically impossible. Nevertheless, a mathematical description of a hard detector has recently been put forward in the form of the "absorbing boundary rule" involving an absorbing boundary condition on the detecting surface Ω\partial \Omega. We show here that in a suitable (non-obvious) limit, the imaginary potential VV yields a non-trivial distribution of detection time and place in agreement with the absorbing boundary rule. That is, a hard detector can be obtained as a limit, but it is a different limit than Allcock considered.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1911.12730,
  title  = {Absorbing Boundary Condition as Limiting Case of Imaginary Potentials},
  author = {Roderich Tumulka},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.12730},
  year   = {2023}
}

Comments

12 pages LaTeX, no figures

R2 v1 2026-06-23T12:30:10.440Z