English

Discrepancy between experimental and theoretical $\beta$-decay rates resolved from first principles

Nuclear Theory 2024-02-16 v1

Abstract

β\beta-decay, a process that changes a neutron into a proton (and vice versa), is the dominant decay mode of atomic nuclei. This decay offers a unique window to physics beyond the standard model, and is at the heart of microphysical processes in stellar explosions and the synthesis of the elements in the Universe. For 50 years, a central puzzle has been that observed β\beta-decay rates are systematically smaller than theoretical predictions. This was attributed to an apparent quenching of the fundamental coupling constant gAg_A \simeq 1.27 in the nucleus by a factor of about 0.75 compared to the β\beta-decay of a free neutron. The origin of this quenching is controversial and has so far eluded a first-principles theoretical understanding. Here we address this puzzle and show that this quenching arises to a large extent from the coupling of the weak force to two nucleons as well as from strong correlations in the nucleus. We present state-of-the-art computations of β\beta-decays from light to heavy nuclei. Our results are consistent with experimental data, including the pioneering measurement for 100^{100}Sn. These theoretical advances are enabled by systematic effective field theories of the strong and weak interactions combined with powerful quantum many-body techniques. This work paves the way for systematic theoretical predictions for fundamental physics problems. These include the synthesis of heavy elements in neutron star mergers and the search for neutrino-less double-β\beta-decay, where an analogous quenching puzzle is a major source of uncertainty in extracting the neutrino mass scale.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1903.00047,
  title  = {Discrepancy between experimental and theoretical $\beta$-decay rates resolved from first principles},
  author = {P. Gysbers and G. Hagen and J. D. Holt and G. R. Jansen and T. D. Morris and P. Navratil and T. Papenbrock and S. Quaglioni and A. Schwenk and S. R. Stroberg and K. A. Wendt},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.00047},
  year   = {2024}
}

Comments

20 pages, 18 figures

R2 v1 2026-06-23T07:54:48.833Z