Determining the Outerthickness of Graphs Is NP-Hard
Abstract
We give a short, self-contained, and easily verifiable proof that determining the outerthickness of a general graph is NP-hard. This resolves a long-standing open problem on the computational complexity of outerthickness. Moreover, our hardness result applies to a more general covering problem , defined as follows. Fix a proper graph class whose membership is decidable. Given an undirected simple graph and an integer , the task is to cover the edge set by at most subsets such that each subgraph belongs to . Note that if is monotone (in particular, when is the class of all outerplanar graphs), any such cover can be converted into an edge partition by deleting overlaps; hence, in this case, covering and partitioning are equivalent. Our result shows that for every proper graph class whose membership is decidable and that satisfies all of the following conditions: (a) is closed under topological minors, (b) is closed under -sums, and (c) contains a cycle of length , the problem is NP-hard for every fixed integer . In particular: For equal to the class of all outerplanar graphs, our result settles the long-standing open problem on the complexity of determining outerthickness. For equal to the class of all planar graphs, our result complements Mansfield's NP-hardness result for the thickness, which applies only to the case . It is also worth noting that each of the three conditions above is necessary. If is the class of all eulerian graphs, then cond. (a) fails. If is the class of all pseudoforests, then cond. (b) fails. If is the class of all forests, then cond. (c) fails. For each of these three classes , the problem is solvable in polynomial time for every fixed integer , showing that none of the three conditions can be dropped.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2602.07607,
title = {Determining the Outerthickness of Graphs Is NP-Hard},
author = {Pin-Hsian Lee and Te-Cheng Liu and Meng-Tsung Tsai},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.07607},
year = {2026}
}