Complexity of Propositional Abduction for Restricted Sets of Boolean Functions
Abstract
Abduction is a fundamental and important form of non-monotonic reasoning. Given a knowledge base explaining how the world behaves it aims at finding an explanation for some observed manifestation. In this paper we focus on propositional abduction, where the knowledge base and the manifestation are represented by propositional formulae. The problem of deciding whether there exists an explanation has been shown to be SigmaP2-complete in general. We consider variants obtained by restricting the allowed connectives in the formulae to certain sets of Boolean functions. We give a complete classification of the complexity for all considerable sets of Boolean functions. In this way, we identify easier cases, namely NP-complete and polynomial cases; and we highlight sources of intractability. Further, we address the problem of counting the explanations and draw a complete picture for the counting complexity.
Cite
@article{arxiv.0912.3134,
title = {Complexity of Propositional Abduction for Restricted Sets of Boolean Functions},
author = {Nadia Creignou and Johannes Schmidt and Michael Thomas},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:0912.3134},
year = {2010}
}
Comments
Proceedings version, the journal version is available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1006.4923